THE HOUSE OF COMMONS
		CONSTITUENCIES BEGINNING WITH "T"
		Last updated 09/09/2012
Date		Name	Born	Died	Age
		Dates in italics in the first column denote that the election held on that
		date was a by-election. Dates shown in normal type were general elections,
		or, in some instances, the date of a successful petition against a
		previous election result.
		Dates in italics in the "Born" column indicate that the MP was baptised on
		that date; dates in italics in the "Died" column indicate that the MP was
		buried on that date
		TAIN (NORTHERN) BURGHS
		comprising Tain and Dingwall (Ross-shire),
		Dornoch (Sutherland),Wick (Caithness)
		and Kirkwall (Orkney)
26 May 1708		William Sutherland,styled Lord Strathnaver	19 Dec 1683	13 Jul 1720	36
5 May 1709		Robert Douglas,later [1715] 12th Earl of
		Morton	by 1662	22 Jan 1730
27 Oct 1710		Robert Munro,later [1729] 6th baronet	24 Aug 1684	17 Jan 1746	61
28 May 1741		Charles Areskine	1680	5 Apr 1763	82
		Election declared void 1 Mar 1742
2 Apr 1742		Robert Craigie	c 1685	10 Mar 1760
22 Jul 1747		Sir Harry Munro,7th baronet	c 1720	12 Jun 1781
20 Apr 1761		John Scott	1725	7 Dec 1775	50
11 Apr 1768		Alexander Mackay	1717	31 May 1789	71
26 Apr 1773		James Grant	1720	13 Apr 1806	85
2 Oct 1780		Charles Ross	c 1729	5 Mar 1797
26 Apr 1784		Charles James Fox   [he was also returned	24 Jan 1749	13 Sep 1806	57
		for Westminster,for which he chose to sit]
15 Mar 1786		George Ross	1700	7 Apr 1786	85
30 Jun 1786		Charles Lockhart-Ross,later [1790] 7th baronet	15 Aug 1763	8 Feb 1814	50
20 Jun 1796		William Dundas	1762	14 Nov 1845	83
30 Jul 1802		John Charles Villiers,later [1824] 3rd Earl
		of Clarendon	14 Nov 1757	22 Dec 1838	81
26 Jun 1805		James MacDonald,later [1826] 2nd baronet	14 Feb 1784	29 Jun 1832	48
24 Nov 1806		John Randoll Mackenzie	c 1763	28 Jul 1809
7 May 1808		William Henry Fremantle	28 Dec 1766	19 Oct 1850	83
30 Oct 1812		Hugh Innes,later [1819] 1st baronet	c 1764	16 Aug 1831
23 Aug 1830		James Loch	7 May 1780	28 Jun 1855	75
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1832
		TAMWORTH (STAFFORDSHIRE)
30 Apr 1660		Richard Newdigate,later [1677] 1st baronet	17 Sep 1602	14 Oct 1678	76
		Thomas Fox	4 Mar 1622	1666	44
8 Apr 1661		Amos Walrond	c 1623	11 Nov 1668
		John Swinfen  (to Aug 1679)	19 Mar 1613	12 Apr 1694	81
26 Nov 1669		John Ferrers  [he was unseated on petition	26 Jul 1629	14 Aug 1680	51
		in favour of Charles Boyle,Lord Clifford
		26 Mar 1670]
26 Mar 1670		Charles Boyle,Viscount Dungarvan [I]	17 Nov 1639	12 Oct 1694	54
25 Feb 1679		Sir Thomas Thynne,2nd baronet, later [1682]
		1st Viscount Weymouth  (to 1685)	8 Sep 1640	28 Jul 1714	73
11 Aug 1679		Sir Andrew Hacket	c 1632	19 Mar 1709
28 Feb 1681		John Swinfen	19 Mar 1613	12 Apr 1694	81
		Sir Thomas Thynne,2nd baronet, later [1682]
		1st Viscount Weymouth	8 Sep 1640	28 Jul 1714	73
		John Turton
		Double return of Thynne and Turton which
		was not resolved before the Parliament ended
31 Mar 1685		Richard Grobham Howe,later [1703] 3rd
		baronet	c 1652	3 Jul 1730
		Sir Henry Gough  (to 1698)	3 Jan 1650	24 Jan 1725	75
11 Jan 1689		Henry Sydney,later [Sep 1689] 1st Viscount
		Sydney and [1694] 1st Earl of Romney	c Mar 1641	8 Apr 1704	63
8 May 1689		Henry Boyle,later [1714] 1st Baron Carleton	12 Jul 1669	14 Mar 1725	55
28 Feb 1690		Michael Biddulph	19 Nov 1661	26 Jul 1697	35
1 Nov 1695		Thomas Guy  (to 1708)	c 1644	27 Dec 1724
28 Jul 1698		John Chetwynd  [he was unseated on petition	1643	9 Dec 1702	59
		in favour of Sir Henry Gough 17 Mar 1699]
17 Mar 1699		Sir Henry Gough	3 Jan 1650	24 Jan 1725	75
27 Nov 1701		Henry Thynne  [at the general election in	8 Feb 1675	20 Dec 1708	33
		Jul 1702,Thynne was also returned for
		Weymouth and Melcombe Regis,for which he
		chose to sit]
14 Dec 1702		Joseph Girdler  (to 1715)	15 May 1642	16 Nov 1724	82
5 May 1708		Richard Swinfen	11 Apr 1677	22 Jul 1726	49
9 Oct 1710		Samuel Bracebridge  (to 1723)   [after the	4 Apr 1673	11 Nov 1735	62
		general election in Mar 1722,Bracebridge was
		unseated on petition in favour of Richard
		Swinfen 23 Jan 1723]
31 Jan 1715		William Inge	28 Sep 1669	3 Jul 1731	61
24 Mar 1722		Francis Willoughby,later [1729] 2nd Baron
		Middleton  (to Aug 1727)	29 Sep 1692	31 Jul 1758	65
23 Jan 1723		Richard Swinfen	11 Apr 1677	22 Jul 1726	49
30 Jan 1727		George Compton,later [1754] 6th Earl of
		Northampton	1692	6 Dec 1758	66
21 Aug 1727		William O'Brien,4th Earl of Inchiquin [I]	c 1700	18 Jul 1777
		Thomas Willoughby	11 Jun 1694	2 Dec 1742	48
29 Apr 1734		Lord John Philip Sackville  (to 1747)	22 Jun 1713	3 Dec 1765	52
		George Compton,later [1754] 6th Earl of
		Northampton   [he was also returned for	1692	6 Dec 1758	66
		Northampton,for which he chose to sit]
3 Apr 1735		Charles Cotes	c 1703	21 Mar 1748
6 May 1741		John Floyer  [he was unseated on petition	c 1681	4 Jun 1762
		in favour of Charles Cotes 22 Mar 1742]
22 Mar 1742		Charles Cotes	c 1703	21 Mar 1748
3 Jul 1747		Thomas Villiers,later [1776] 1st Earl of
		Clarendon  (to 1756)	1709	11 Dec 1786	77
		Sir Henry Harpur,5th baronet	c 1708	7 Jun 1748
12 Dec 1748		Sir Robert Burdett,4th baronet  (to 1768)	28 May 1716	13 Feb 1797	80
28 Jun 1756		George Bussy Villiers,styled Viscount Villiers,
		later [1769] 4th Earl of Jersey	9 Jun 1735	22 Aug 1805	70
23 Dec 1765		Edward Thurlow,later [1778] 1st Baron
		Thurlow  (to 1778)	9 Dec 1731	12 Sep 1806	74
18 Mar 1768		William de Grey,later [1780] 1st Baron	7 Jul 1719	9 May 1781	61
		Walsingham  [he was also returned for
		Newport,for which he chose to sit]
30 Nov 1768		Charles Vernon	1719	3 Aug 1810	91
10 Oct 1774		Thomas de Grey,later [1781] 2nd Baron
		Walsingham  (to 1780)	14 Jul 1748	16 Jan 1818	69
10 Jun 1778		Anthony Chamier  (to Nov 1780)	6 Oct 1725	12 Oct 1780	55
11 Sep 1780		John Courtenay  (to 1796)	22 Aug 1738	24 Mar 1816	77
27 Nov 1780		John Calvert	6 May 1726	22 Feb 1804	77
5 Apr 1784		John Calvert	c 1758	2 Jun 1844
18 Jun 1790		Sir Robert Peel  (to 1820)	25 Apr 1750	3 May 1830	80
27 May 1796		Thomas Carter	c 1761	10 Jun 1835
6 Jul 1802		William Loftus	1752	15 Jun 1831	78
7 Oct 1812		Lord Charles Vere Ferrers Townshend	16 Sep 1785	5 Nov 1853	68
19 Jun 1818		William Yates Peel  (to 1830)	3 Aug 1789	1 Jun 1858	68
9 Mar 1820		Lord Charles Vere Ferrers Townshend
		(to 1835)	16 Sep 1785	5 Nov 1853	68
30 Jul 1830		Sir Robert Peel,2nd baronet  (to 1850)	5 Feb 1788	2 Jul 1850	62
5 Jan 1835		William Yates Peel	3 Aug 1789	1 Jun 1858	68
25 Aug 1837		Edward Henry A'Court	10 Dec 1783	22 Sep 1855	71
28 Jul 1847		William Yates Peel	3 Aug 1789	1 Jun 1858	68
18 Dec 1847		John Townshend,later [1855] 4th Marquess
		Townshend  (to 1856)	28 Mar 1798	10 Sep 1863	65
19 Jul 1850		Sir Robert Peel,3rd baronet  (to 1880)	4 May 1822	9 May 1895	73
7 Feb 1856		John Villiers Stuart Townshend,Viscount
		Raynham,later [1863] 5th Marquess
		Townshend	10 Apr 1831	26 Oct 1899	68
12 Oct 1863		John Peel	4 Feb 1804	2 Apr 1872	68
17 Nov 1868		Sir Henry Lytton Earle Bulwer,later [1871]
		1st Baron Dalling & Bulwer	13 Feb 1801	23 May 1872	71
28 Mar 1871		John Peel	4 Feb 1804	2 Apr 1872	68
16 Apr 1872		Robert William Hanbury	24 Feb 1845	28 Apr 1903	58
25 Apr 1878		Hamar Alfred Bass  (to 1885)	30 Jul 1842	8 Apr 1898	55
3 Apr 1880		Jabez Spencer Balfour	4 Sep 1843	23 Feb 1916	72
		For further information on this MP, see the
		note at the foot of this page.
		REPRESENTATION REDUCED
		TO ONE MEMBER 1885
3 Dec 1885		Philip Albert Muntz,later [1902] 1st baronet	5 Jan 1839	21 Dec 1908	69
14 Jan 1909		Francis Alexander Newdigate-Newdegate	31 Dec 1862	2 Jan 1936	73
		[kt 1917]
23 Feb 1917		Henry Wilson-Fox	18 Aug 1863	22 Nov 1921	58
17 Jan 1922		Sir Percy Wilson Newson,1st baronet	4 Apr 1874	17 May 1950	76
6 Dec 1923		Sir Edward Maugar Iliffe,later [1933] 1st
		Baron Iliffe	17 May 1877	25 Jul 1960	83
2 Dec 1929		Sir Arthur Herbert Drummond Ramsay-
		Steel-Maitland,1st baronet	5 Jul 1876	30 Mar 1935	58
10 May 1935		Sir John Serocold Paget Mellor,2nd baronet	6 Jul 1893	15 Jul 1986	93
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1945
		BUT REVIVED 1997
1 May 1997		Brian David Jenkins	19 Sep 1942
6 May 2010		Christopher John Pincher	24 Sep 1969
		TATTON (CHESHIRE)
9 Jun 1983		Mostyn Neil Hamilton	9 Mar 1949
1 May 1997		Martin Bell	31 Aug 1938
7 Jun 2001		George Gideon Oliver Osborne	23 May 1971
		TAUNTON (SOMERSET)
30 Mar 1660		Sir William Wyndham,later [1661] 1st baronet	c 1632	28 Oct 1683
		(to Feb 1679)
		Thomas Gorges	c 1618	21 Oct 1670
4 Apr 1661		Sir William Portman,6th baronet  (to Sep 1679)	5 Sep 1643	Mar 1690	46
20 Feb 1679		John Trenchard  [kt 1689] (to 1685)	30 Mar 1649	27 Apr 1695	46
9 Sep 1679		Sir John Cutler,1st baronet  [he was unseated	c 1608	15 Apr 1693
		on petition in favour of Edmund Prideaux
		8 Dec 1680]
8 Dec 1680		Edmund Prideaux	4 Dec 1634	12 Oct 1702	67
18 Mar 1685		Sir William Portman,6th baronet  (to Apr 1690)	5 Sep 1643	18 Mar 1690	46
		John Sanford	2 Jan 1640	1711	71
10 Mar 1690		Edward Clarke  (to 1710)	14 Sep 1650	1 Oct 1710	60
10 Apr 1690		John Speke	c 1652	1728
10 Aug 1698		Henry Portman  [at the general election in	c 1637	23 Feb 1728
		Jan 1701,Portman was also returned for
		Wells,for which he chose to sit]
17 Mar 1701		Sir Francis Warre,1st baronet  (to 1715)	c 1659	1 Dec 1718
12 Oct 1710		Henry Seymour Portman	c 1637	23 Feb 1728
		[Both sitting members (Warre and Portman)
		were again returned at the general election
		in Feb 1715. Both members were subsequently
		unseated on petition in favour of Sir William
		Pynsent and James Smith 30 Aug 1715]
30 Aug 1715		William Pynsent,later [1719] 2nd baronet	c 1679	8 Jan 1765
		James Smith  (to 1727)	c 1681	c 1734
21 Mar 1722		John Trenchard	c 1668	16 Dec 1723
18 Jan 1724		Abraham Elton,later [1728] 2nd baronet	30 Jun 1679	20 Oct 1742	63
19 Aug 1727		George Speke	c 1686	2 Jan 1753
		Francis Fane  (to 1741)	c 1698	27 May 1757
26 Apr 1734		Henry William Portman	c 1709	19 Jan 1761
13 May 1741		Sir John Chapman,2nd baronet  (to 1747)	c 1710	29 Jan 1781
		John Buck	30 Dec 1703	3 Apr 1745	41
16 Apr 1745		Percy Wyndham-O'Brien,later [1756] 1st Earl
		of Thomond [I]	c 1723	21 Jul 1774
29 Jun 1747		Sir Charles Wyndham,4th baronet,later [1750]
		2nd Earl of of Egremont	19 Aug 1710	21 Aug 1763	53
		Robert Webb  (to 1754)	c 1719	9 Sep 1765
27 Feb 1750		William Rowley  [kt 1753]	c 1690	1 Jan 1768
15 Apr 1754		George Carpenter,3rd Baron Carpenter,
		later [1761] 1st Earl of Tyrconnel  (to 1762)	26 Aug 1723	9 Mar 1762	38
		John Halliday	c 1709	8 Jun 1754
24 Dec 1754		Robert Maxwell,later [1759] 2nd Baron
		Farnham [I],[1760] 1st Viscount Farnham [I] and
		[1763] 1st Earl of Farnham [I]  (to 1768)	c 1720	16 Nov 1779
24 Mar 1762		Laurence Sulivan	c 1713	Feb 1786
18 Mar 1768		Alexander Popham	c 1729	13 Oct 1810
		Nathaniel Webb  (to 1775)	21 Aug 1725	Nov 1786	61
18 Oct 1774		Edward Stratford,later [1777] 2nd Earl of
		Aldborough	1734	2 Jan 1801	66
		[Both sitting members (Webb and Stratford)
		were unseated on petition in favour of
		John Halliday and Alexander Popham
		16 Mar 1775]
16 Mar 1775		John Halliday  (to 1784)	c 1737	21 Apr 1805
		Alexander Popham	c 1729	13 Oct 1810
12 Sep 1780		John Roberts		9 Feb 1782
20 Mar 1782		Benjamin Hammet  (to 1800)	c 1736	22 Jul 1800
5 Apr 1784		Alexander Popham	c 1729	13 Oct 1810
27 May 1796		William Morland  (to 1806)	c Apr 1739	14 Jul 1815	76
7 Aug 1800		John Hammet  (to 1811)	20 Nov 1767	16 Apr 1811	43
4 Nov 1806		Alexander Baring,later [1835] 1st Baron
		Ashburton  (to 1826)	27 Oct 1774	12 May 1848	73
1 May 1811		Henry Powell Collins	1776	22 Aug 1854	78
24 Jun 1818		Sir William Burroughs,1st baronet   [he was	c 1753	1 Jun 1829
		unseated on petition in favour of Henry Powell
		Collins 7 May 1819]
7 May 1819		Henry Powell Collins	1776	22 Aug 1854	78
6 Apr 1820		John Ashley Warre	5 Oct 1787	18 Nov 1860	73
22 Jun 1826		Henry Seymour	10 Nov 1776	27 Nov 1849	73
		William Peachy	c 1763	21 Nov 1838
6 Aug 1830		Henry Labouchere,later [1859] 1st
		Baron Taunton  (to 1859)	15 Aug 1798	13 Jul 1869	70
		Edward Thomas Bainbridge	13 Dec 1798	30 Sep 1872	73
11 Feb 1842		Sir Thomas Edward Colebrooke,4th baronet	19 Aug 1813	11 Jan 1890	76
9 Jul 1852		Arthur Mills   [his election was declared	20 Jul 1816	12 Oct 1898	82
		void 18 Apr 1853]
4 May 1853		Sir John William Ramsden,5th baronet	14 Sep 1831	15 Apr 1914	82
28 Mar 1857		Arthur Mills  (to 1865)	20 Jul 1816	12 Oct 1898	82
9 Aug 1859		George Augustus Frederick Cavendish-
		Bentinck	9 Jul 1821	9 Apr 1891	69
12 Jul 1865		Alexander Charles Barclay  (to 1880)	1823	10 Jan 1893	69
		Lord William Montagu Hay,later [1878] 10th
		Marquess of Tweeddale	27 Jan 1826	25 Nov 1911	85
18 Nov 1868		Edward William Cox	1809	24 Nov 1879	70
		[He was unseated on petition in favour of
		Henry James 8 Mar 1869]
8 Mar 1869		Sir Henry James,later [1895] 1st Baron
		James of Hereford  (to 1885)	30 Oct 1828	18 Aug 1911	82
1 Apr 1880		Sir William Palliser	18 Jun 1830	4 Feb 1882	51
17 Feb 1882		Samuel Charles Allsopp,later [1887] 2nd
		Baron Hindlip  (to 1887)	24 Mar 1842	12 Jul 1897	55
		REPRESENTATION REDUCED
		TO ONE MEMBER 1885
23 Apr 1887		Alfred Percy Allsopp	26 Aug 1861	22 Feb 1929	67
12 Jul 1895		Alfred Cholmeley Earle Welby	22 Aug 1849	18 May 1937	87
15 Jan 1906		Sir Edward Boyle,1st baronet	6 Sep 1848	19 Mar 1909	60
28 Feb 1909		William Robert Wellesley Peel,later [1912] 2nd
		Viscount Peel and [1929] 1st Earl Peel	7 Jan 1867	28 Sep 1937	70
11 Nov 1912		Sir Gilbert Alan Hamilton Wills,2nd baronet,
		later [1929] 1st Baron Dulverton	28 Mar 1880	1 Dec 1956	76
14 Dec 1918		Dennis Fortescue Boles,later [1922] 1st
		baronet	6 Sep 1861	26 Jul 1935	74
8 Apr 1921		Sir Arthur Sackville Trevor Griffith-
		Boscawen	18 Oct 1865	1 Jun 1946	80
15 Nov 1922		John Hope Simpson  [kt 1925]	23 Jul 1868	10 Apr 1961	92
29 Oct 1924		Andrew Hamilton Gault	18 Aug 1882	28 Nov 1958	76
14 Nov 1935		Edward Thomas Ruscombe Wickham	4 May 1890	25 Aug 1957	67
26 Jul 1945		Victor John Collins,later [1958] Baron
		Stonham [L]	1 Jul 1903	22 Dec 1971	68
23 Feb 1950		Henry Lennox d'Aubigne Hopkinson,later
		[1956] 1st Baron Colyton	3 Jan 1902	6 Jan 1996	94
14 Feb 1956		Edward Dillon Lott du Cann  [kt 1985]	28 May 1924
11 Jun 1987		David John Nicholson	17 Aug 1944
1 May 1997		Jacqueline Margaret Ballard	4 Jan 1953
7 Jun 2001		Adrian John Flook	9 Jul 1963
5 May 2005		Jeremy Richard Browne	17 May 1970
		NAME ALTERED TO "TAUNTON DEANE" 2010
		TAUNTON DEANE (SOMERSET)
6 May 2010		Jeremy Richard Browne	17 May 1970
		TAVISTOCK (DEVON)
5 Apr 1660		William Russell,styled Lord Russell from 1678	29 Sep 1639	21 Jul 1683	43
		George Howard  (to 1673)	Feb 1622	17 Sep 1671	49
		Elizeus Crymes
		Double return between Howard and Crymes.
		Howard seated 27 Apr 1660
5 Apr 1661		Sir John Davie,2nd baronet  [unseated on	6 Dec 1612	31 Jul 1678	65
		petition in favour of Russell 17 Dec 1661]
		George Howard  (to 1673)	Feb 1622	17 Sep 1671	49
		William Russell,styled Lord Russell from 1678	29 Sep 1639	21 Jul 1683	43
		Double return between Howard and Russell.
		Howard seated 16 May 1661
17 Dec 1661		William Russell  (to 1679)	29 Sep 1639	21 Jul 1683	43
26 Mar 1673		Sir Francis Drake,3rd baronet  (to 1685)	1 May 1647	15 Jun 1718	71
13 Feb 1679		Edward Russell (Lord Edward from 1694)	c 1642	30 Jun 1714
23 Mar 1685		Sir James Butler	c 1642	early 1704
		John Beare	c 1645	early 1711
14 Jan 1689		Robert Russell  (Lord Robert from 1694)  (to 1703)	c 1644	26 Jul 1703
		Sir Francis Drake,3rd baronet	1 May 1647	15 Jun 1718	71
29 Oct 1695		Lord James Russell  [he was unseated on	c 1647	22 Jun 1712
		petition in favour of Ambrose Manaton
		12 Mar 1696]
12 Mar 1696		Ambrose Manaton	17 Jan 1648	1 Jun 1696	48
10 Nov 1696		Sir Francis Drake	1 May 1647	15 Jun 1718	71
9 Jan 1701		Lord Edward Russell	c 1642	30 Jun 1714
24 Jul 1702		Lord James Russell  (to Dec 1703)  [he was	c 1647	22 Jun 1712
		unseated on petition in favour of Henry
		Manaton 21 Dec 1703]
26 Nov 1703		James Bulteel  (to 1708)	c 1676	1757
21 Dec 1703		Henry Manaton  (to 1711)  [he was unseated	17 Sep 1650	c May 1716	65
		on petition in favour of James Bulteel
		3 Feb 1711]
10 May 1708		Sir John Cope,later [1721] 6th baronet  (to 1728)	1 Dec 1673	8 Dec 1749	76
		[at the general election in Aug 1727,Cope
		was also returned for Hampshire,for which he
		chose to sit]
3 Feb 1711		James Bulteel	c 1676	1757
1 Feb 1715		Francis Henry Drake,later [1718] 4th baronet	2 Mar 1694	26 Jan 1740	45
		(to 1734)
24 Feb 1728		Sir Humphrey Monoux,4th baronet	c 1702	3 Dec 1757
29 Apr 1734		Charles Fane,later [1744] 2nd Viscount
		Fane [I]  (to 1747)	after 1708	24 Jan 1766
		Sidney Meadows	c 1699	15 Nov 1792
9 May 1741		Lord Sherard Manners	c 1713	13 Jan 1742
28 Jan 1742		James Hamilton,1st Viscount Limerick [I],
		later [1756] 1st Earl of Clanbrassil [I]	c 1691	17 Mar 1758
4 Jul 1747		Richard Leveson-Gower  [he was also returned	30 Apr 1726	19 Oct 1753	27
		for Lichfield,for which he chose to sit]
		Thomas Brand  (to 1754)	c 1717	22 Aug 1770
12 Dec 1747		Sir Richard Wrottesley,7th baronet	12 Apr 1721	20 Jul 1769	48
24 Apr 1754		Richard Rigby  (to 1788)	Feb 1722	8 Apr 1788	66
		Jeffrey French		14 May 1754
10 Dec 1754		Richard Vernon	18 Jun 1726	16 Sep 1800	74
28 Mar 1761		Richard Neville Aldworth (Neville from 1762)	3 Nov 1717	17 Jul 1793	75
8 Oct 1774		Richard Fitzpatrick  (to Jul 1807)   [at the	24 Jan 1748	25 Apr 1813	65
		general election in May 1807,he was also
		returned for Bedfordshire,for which he
		chose to sit]
24 Apr 1788		Lord John Russell,later [1802] 6th Duke of
		Bedford	6 Jul 1766	20 Oct 1839	73
19 Jun 1790		Charles William Wyndham  [he was also	8 Oct 1760	1 Jul 1828	67
		returned for Midhurst,for which he chose
		to sit]
27 Dec 1790		Lord John Russell,later [1802] 6th Duke of
		Bedford	6 Jul 1766	20 Oct 1839	73
25 Mar 1802		Lord Robert Spencer	8 May 1747	23 Jun 1831	84
11 May 1807		Lord William Russell  (to 1819)	20 Aug 1767	6 May 1840	72
		For further information on the death of this MP,
		see the note at the foot of this page
20 Jul 1807		Charles Grey,styled Viscount Howick,later
		[Nov 1807] 2nd Earl Grey	13 Mar 1764	17 Jul 1845	81
19 Jan 1808		George Ponsonby	4 Mar 1755	8 Jul 1817	62
8 Oct 1812		Richard Fitzpatrick	24 Jan 1748	25 Apr 1813	65
4 May 1813		Lord John Russell, later [1861] 1st Earl Russell	18 Aug 1792	28 May 1878	85
12 Mar 1817		Lord Robert Spencer	8 May 1747	23 Jun 1831	84
18 Jun 1818		Lord John Russell, later [1861] 1st Earl Russell
		(to 1820)	18 Aug 1792	28 May 1878	85
27 Mar 1819		John Peter Grant  (to 1826)	21 Sep 1774	17 May 1848	73
11 Mar 1820		John Nicholas Fazakerley	7 Mar 1787	16 Jul 1852	65
22 May 1820		Hugh Fortescue,styled Viscount Ebrington,
		later [1841] 2nd Earl Fortescue  (to Nov 1830)	13 Feb 1783	14 Sep 1861	78
		[at the general election in Aug 1830,he was
		also returned for Devon,for which he chose
		to sit]
12 Jun 1826		Lord William Russell	20 Aug 1767	6 May 1840	72
		For further information on the death of this MP,
		see the note at the foot of this page
2 Aug 1830		William Russell,styled Baron Russell until 1839
		and Marquess of Tavistock from 1839,later
		[1861] 8th Duke of Bedford  (to Oct 1831)	1 Jul 1809	26 May 1872	62
27 Nov 1830		Lord John Russell, later [1861] 1st Earl Russell	18 Aug 1792	28 May 1878	85
		[at the general election held in May 1831,he
		was also returned for Devon,for which he
		chose to sit]
13 Jul 1831		John Heywood Hawkins  (to 1832)	21 May 1802	27 Jun 1877	75
25 Oct 1831		Francis Russell	7 Mar 1793	24 Nov 1832	39
10 Dec 1832		William Russell,styled Baron Russell until 1839
		and Marquess of Tavistock from 1839,later
		[1861] 8th Duke of Bedford  (to 1841)	1 Jul 1809	26 May 1872	62
		Charles Richard Fox	6 Nov 1796	13 Apr 1873	76
8 Jan 1835		John Rundle  (to 1843)	1791	4 Jan 1864	72
30 Jun 1841		Lord Edward Russell  (to 1847)	24 Apr 1805	21 May 1887	82
16 Mar 1843		John Salusbury Trelawney,later [1856]
		9th baronet  (to Apr 1852)	2 Jun 1816	4 Aug 1885	69
2 Aug 1847		Edward Southwell Russell,later [1874] 23rd
		Lord de Clifford  (to Jul 1852)	30 Apr 1824	6 Aug 1877	53
28 Apr 1852		Samuel Carter  (to 1853)   [he was unseated	1814	31 Jan 1878	63
		on petition in favour of Robert Joseph
		Phillimore 21 Feb 1853]
8 Jul 1852		George Henry Charles Byng,later [1886]
		3rd Earl of Strafford  (to Sep 1857)	22 Feb 1830	28 Mar 1898	68
21 Feb 1853		Robert Joseph Phillimore [kt 1862],later [1881]
		1st baronet	5 Nov 1810	4 Feb 1885	74
28 Mar 1857		Sir John Salusbury Trelawney,9th baronet	2 Jun 1816	4 Aug 1885	69
		(to 1865)
4 Sep 1857		Lord Arthur John Edward Russell
		(to 1885)	13 Jun 1825	4 Apr 1892	66
12 Jul 1865		Joseph d'Aguilar Samuda	21 May 1813	27 Apr 1885	71
		REPRESENTATION REDUCED
		TO ONE MEMBER 1868
7 Dec 1885		Hugh Fortescue,styled Viscount Ebrington,
		later [1905] 4th Earl Fortescue	16 Apr 1854	29 Oct 1932	78
Jul 1892		Hugh Courtenay Fownes Luttrell	10 Feb 1857	14 Jan 1918	60
11 Oct 1900		John Ward Spear  [kt 1911]	1848	27 Apr 1921	72
24 Jan 1906		Hugh Courtenay Fownes Luttrell	10 Feb 1857	14 Jan 1918	60
Dec 1910		John Ward Spear  [kt 1911]	1848	27 Apr 1921	72
14 Dec 1918		Charles Williams	21 Apr 1886	28 Oct 1955	69
15 Nov 1922		Maxwell Ruthven Thornton	11 Jul 1878	30 Aug 1950	72
29 Oct 1924		Philip Percy Kenyon-Slaney	12 Feb 1896	9 Sep 1928	32
11 Oct 1928		Wallace Duffield Wright VC	20 Sep 1875	25 Mar 1953	77
		For further information on this MP and VC
		winner,see the note at the foot of this page
27 Oct 1931		Colin Mark Patrick	21 Oct 1893	7 Jan 1942	48
2 Apr 1942		Henry Gray Studholme,later [1956] 1st baronet	13 Jun 1899	9 Oct 1987	88
31 Mar 1966		Michael Ray Dibdin Heseltine,later [2001]
		Baron Heseltine [L]	21 Mar 1933
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED FEB 1974
		TAYSIDE NORTH
9 Jun 1983		William Connoll Walker	20 Feb 1929
1 May 1997		John Ramsay Swinney	13 Apr 1964
7 Jun 2001		Peter Wishart	9 Mar 1962
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 2005
		TEIGNBRIDGE (DEVON)
9 Jun 1983		Patrick Charles Martyn Nicholls	14 Nov 1948
7 Jun 2001		Richard Younger-Ross	29 Jan 1953
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 2010
		TELFORD
1 May 1997		Bruce Joseph Grocott,later [2001]
		Baron Grocott [L]	1 Nov 1940
7 Jun 2001		David Wright	22 Dec 1966
		TEST (SOUTHAMPTON)
23 Feb 1950		Horace Maybray King,later [1971] Baron
		Maybray King [L]	25 May 1901	3 Sep 1986	85
26 May 1955		John Melbourne Howard	1913	10 Aug 1982	69
15 Oct 1964		Sir John Fletcher-Cooke	8 Aug 1911	19 May 1989	77
31 Mar 1966		Richard Charles Mitchell	22 Aug 1927	18 Sep 2003	76
18 Jun 1970		Stanley James Allen Hill	21 Dec 1926	16 Feb 1999	72
10 Oct 1974		Bryan Charles Gould	11 Feb 1939
3 May 1979		Stanley James Allen Hill  [kt 1996]	21 Dec 1926	16 Feb 1999	72
1 May 1997		Alan Patrick Vincent Whitehead	15 Sep 1950
		TEWKESBURY (GLOUCESTERSHIRE)
12 Apr 1660		Sir Henry Capell, later [1692] 1st Baron
		Capell of Tewkesbury  (to 1685)	6 Mar 1638	30 May 1696	58
		Richard Dowdeswell	24 Feb 1601	25 Mar 1673	72
11 Nov 1673		Sir Francis Russell,2nd baronet  (to 1690)	c 1638	25 Jan 1706
23 Mar 1685		Richard Dowdeswell  (to 1710)	c 1653	7 Oct 1711
18 Feb 1690		Sir Henry Capell,later [1692] 1st Baron
		Capell of Tewkesbury	6 Mar 1638	30 May 1696	58
14 Nov 1692		Sir Francis Winnington	7 Nov 1634	1 May 1700	65
26 Jul 1698		Charles Hancock	13 Mar 1643	29 Mar 1717	74
10 Jan 1701		Edmund Bray	7 Sep 1678	6 Sep 1725	46
6 May 1708		Henry Ireton  (to 1712)	c 1652	14 Dec 1711
10 Oct 1710		William Bromley  (to 1713)	28 Apr 1685	7 Feb 1756	70
1 Jan 1712		William Dowdeswell  (to 1722)	18 Aug 1682	5 Sep 1728	46
5 Sep 1713		Charles Dowdeswell	c 1688	c Jun 1714
18 Jun 1714		Anthony Lechmere	17 Jun 1674	8 Feb 1720	45
25 Jun 1717		Nicholas Lechmere,later [1721] 1st Baron
		Lechmere	5 Aug 1675	18 Jun 1727	51
25 Oct 1721		Thomas Gage,1st Viscount Gage [I]  (to 1754)	c 1695	21 Dec 1754
20 Mar 1722		George Reade	1687	28 Mar 1756	68
29 Apr 1734		Robert Tracy	c 1706	28 Sep 1767
5 May 1741		John Martin	8 Jul 1692	7 Mar 1767	74
30 Jun 1747		William Dowdeswell	12 Mar 1721	6 Feb 1775	53
16 Apr 1754		Nicolson Calvert  (to 1774)	c 1724	4 May 1793
		John Martin	1724	28 May 1794	69
26 Mar 1761		Sir William Codrington,2nd baronet  (to 1792)	26 Oct 1719	11 Mar 1792	72
8 Oct 1774		Joseph Martin	19 Jan 1726	30 Mar 1776	50
8 Apr 1776		James Martin  (to 1807)	4 Jun 1738	26 Jan 1810	71
19 Mar 1792		William Dowdeswell	27 Feb 1760	1 Dec 1828	68
18 Dec 1797		Christopher Bethell-Codrington
		(to 1812)	Oct 1764	4 Feb 1843	78
5 May 1807		Charles Hanbury-Tracy,later [1838] 1st
		Baron Sudeley	28 Dec 1778	10 Feb 1858	79
5 Oct 1812		John Edmund Dowdeswell  (to Dec 1832)	3 Mar 1772	11 Nov 1851	79
		John Martin	27 Nov 1774	4 Jan 1832	57
23 Jan 1832		Charles Hanbury-Tracy,later [1838] 1st
		Baron Sudeley  (to 1837)	28 Dec 1778	16 Feb 1858	80
12 Dec 1832		John Martin	1805	7 Mar 1880	74
6 Jan 1835		William Dowdeswell  (to 1847)	Oct 1804	5 Feb 1870	65
25 Jul 1837		John Martin  (to 1859)	1805	7 Mar 1880	74
28 Jul 1847		Humphrey Brown	1803	6 Jun 1860	56
28 Mar 1857		Frederick Lygon,later [1866] 6th Earl
		Beauchamp  (to 1864)	10 Nov 1830	19 Feb 1891	60
29 Apr 1859		James Martin  (to 1865)	18 May 1807
9 Feb 1864		John Reginald Yorke  (to 1868)	25 Jan 1836	2 Mar 1912	76
12 Jul 1865		William Edward Dowdeswell	Jun 1841	12 Jul 1893	52
20 Mar 1866		Sir Edmund Athony Harley Lechmere,3rd
		baronet	8 Dec 1826	18 Dec 1894	68
		REPRESENTATION REDUCED
		TO ONE MEMBER 1868
17 Nov 1868		William Edwin Price   [following the general	1841	10 Feb 1886	44
		election in Apr 1880, his election was
		declared void 29 Jun 1880]
10 Jul 1880		Richard Biddulph Martin,later [1905] 1st
		baronet	12 May 1838	23 Aug 1916	78
5 Dec 1885		John Reginald Yorke	25 Jan 1836	2 Mar 1912	76
2 Jul 1886		Sir John Edward Dorington,1st baronet	24 Jul 1832	5 Apr 1911	78
23 Jan 1906		Michael Hugh Hicks-Beach,styled Viscount
		Quenington from 1915	19 Jan 1877	23 Apr 1916	39
17 May 1916		William Frederick Hicks-Beach	14 Jul 1841	7 Sep 1923	82
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1918
		BUT REVIVED 1997
1 May 1997		Laurence Anthony Robertson	29 Mar 1958
		THANET EAST (KENT)
28 Feb 1974		Jonathan William Patrick Aitken	30 Aug 1942
		For further information on this MP, see the note
		at the foot of this page
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1983
		THANET NORTH (KENT)
9 Jun 1983		Roger James Gale  [kt 2012]	20 Aug 1943
		THANET SOUTH (KENT)
9 Jun 1983		Jonathan William Patrick Aitken	30 Aug 1942
		For further information on this MP, see the note
		at the foot of this page
1 May 1997		Stephen John Ladyman	6 Nov 1952
6 May 2010		Laura Jane Sandys	1964
		THANET WEST (KENT)
28 Feb 1974		William Rupert Rees-Davies	19 Nov 1916	12 Jan 1992	75
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1983
		THETFORD (NORFOLK)
Apr 1660		Sir Philip Wodehouse,3rd baronet	24 Jul 1608	6 May 1681	72
		Robert Paston,later [1663] 2nd baronet
		and [1679] 1st Earl of Yarmouth	29 May 1631	8 Mar 1683	51
25 Mar 1661		Sir Allen Apsley  (to 1679)	28 Aug 1616	15 Oct 1683	67
		William Gawdy	24 Sep 1612	18 Aug 1669	56
22 Oct 1669		Joseph Williamson  [kt 1672]  (to Mar 1685)	25 Jul 1633	3 Oct 1701	68
24 Feb 1679		William Harbord  [at the 1681 general election,	25 Apr 1635	31 Jul 1692	57
		he was also returned for Launceston,but the
		Parliament was dissolved before he chose
		which seat to represent]
26 Mar 1685		Henry Heveningham  [unseated on petition	5 Jan 1651	26 Nov 1700	49
		in favour of Sir Joseph Williamson 17 Jun 1685]
		William de Grey  (to 1689)	21 Oct 1652	27 Feb 1687	34
17 Jun 1685		Sir Joseph Williamson	25 Jul 1633	3 Oct 1701	68
15 Jan 1689		Sir Henry Hobart  [he was also returned for	c 1658	21 Aug 1698
		Norfolk for which he chose to sit]
		William Harbord  (to Jun 1689)   [he was also	25 Apr 1635	31 Jul 1692	57
		returned for Scarborough and for Launceston,
		for which he chose to sit]
14 Feb 1689		Sir Francis Guybon  (to 1695)	c 1638	23 Jan 1705
20 Jun 1689		John Trenchard  [kt Oct 1689]	30 Mar 1649	27 Apr 1695	46
28 Feb 1690		William Harbord  [he was also returned for	25 Apr 1635	31 Jul 1692	57
		Launceston,for which he chose to sit]
		Sir Francis Guybon  (to 1695)	c 1638	23 Jan 1705
		Sir Joseph Williamson	25 Jul 1633	3 Oct 1701	68
		Adam Felton
		Double return. Harbord and Guybon declared
		elected 3 May 1690
26 May 1690		Baptist May	4 Nov 1628	2 Mar 1697	68
13 Nov 1695		Sir Joseph Williamson  [he was also returned	25 Jul 1633	3 Oct 1701	68
		for Rochester,for which he chose to sit]
		Sir John Wodehouse,4th baronet  (to 1698)	23 Mar 1669	9 Oct 1754	85
10 Jan 1696		James Sloane  [his election was declared	1655	5 Nov 1704	49
		void 27 Jan 1700]
26 Jul 1698		Sir Joseph Williamson  [he was also returned	25 Jul 1633	3 Oct 1701	68
		for Rochester,for which he chose to sit]
16 Jan 1699		Charles Paston,styled Baron Paston	29 May 1673	15 Dec 1718	45
		(to Jan 1701)
8 Feb 1700		James Sloane	1655	5 Nov 1704	49
10 Jan 1701		Sir Joseph Williamson  [he was also returned	25 Jul 1633	3 Oct 1701	68
		for Rochester,for which he chose to sit]
		Edmund Soame  (to Nov 1701)	c 1669	8 Sep 1706
19 Mar 1701		Sir Thomas Hanmer,4th baronet  (to 1702)	24 Sep 1677	7 May 1746	68
29 Nov 1701		Sir John Wodehouse,4th baronet	23 Mar 1669	9 Oct 1754	85
20 Jul 1702		Robert Benson,later [1713] 1st Baron Bingley	25 Mar 1676	9 Apr 1731	55
		Edmund Soame	c 1669	8 Sep 1706
14 May 1705		Sir Thomas Hanmer	24 Sep 1677	7 May 1746	68
		Sir John Wodehouse,4th baronet	23 Mar 1669	9 Oct 1754	85
7 May 1708		Robert Baylis	14 Nov 1673	21 Nov 1748	75
		Thomas de Grey	13 Aug 1680	18 Dec 1765	85
7 Oct 1710		Sir Thomas Hanmer   [he was also returned	24 Sep 1677	7 May 1746	68
		for Suffolk,for which he chose to sit]
		Dudley North  (to 1722)	23 Aug 1684	4 Feb 1730	45
12 Dec 1710		Sir Edmund Bacon,6th baronet	c 1680	30 Apr 1755
21 Aug 1713		Sir William Barker,5th baronet	c 1685	23 Jul 1731
29 Jan 1715		John Ward	13 Jun 1670	17 Mar 1749	78
26 Mar 1722		Sir Edmund Bacon,5th baronet  (to 1739)	7 Aug 1693	4 Oct 1738	45
		Robert Jacomb		14 Dec 1732
1 Feb 1733		Charles Fitzroy (Fitzroy-Scudamore from 1749)	c 1713	22 Aug 1782
		(to 1754)  [at the general election in
		Apr 1754,he was also returned for Hereford,
		for which he chose to sit]
10 Feb 1739		Lord Augustus Fitzroy	16 Oct 1716	28 May 1741	24
29 Dec 1741		Lord Henry Beauclerk  (to 1761)	11 Aug 1701	6 Jan 1761	59
12 Dec 1754		Herbert Westfaling	c 1699	28 Apr 1773
28 Mar 1761		Henry Seymour Conway  (to Oct 1774)	12 Aug 1719	9 Jul 1795	75
		Aubrey Beauclerk,later [1781] 2nd Baron
		Vere of Hanworth and [1787] 5th Duke of
		St.Albans	3 Jun 1740	9 Feb 1802	61
16 Mar 1768		John Drummond	27 Apr 1723	25 Jul 1774	51
6 Sep 1774		Charles Stanhope,styled Viscount Petersham,
		later [1779] 3rd Earl of Harrington	20 Mar 1753	15 Sep 1829	76
10 Oct 1774		Charles Fitzroy,later [1780] 1st Baron	25 Jun 1737	21 Mar 1797	59
		Southampton
		Charles Fitzroy-Scudamore   (to 1782)	c 1713	22 Aug 1782
11 Sep 1780		Richard Hopkins  (to 1784)	c 1728	19 Mar 1799
6 Apr 1782		George Henry Fitzroy,styled Earl of Euston,
		later [1811] 4th Duke of Grafton	14 Jan 1760	28 Sep 1844	84
5 Apr 1784		Sir Charles Kent,1st baronet	c 1743	14 Mar 1811
		George Jennings	c 1721	9 Jun 1790
21 Jun 1790		Robert John Buxton,later [1800] 1st baronet	27 Oct 1753	3 Jun 1839	85
		Joseph Randyll Burch  (to 1802)	c 1756	23 Sep 1826
27 May 1796		John Harrison  (to 1806)	1738	7 Feb 1811	72
8 Jul 1802		Thomas Creevey	5 Mar 1768	5 Jun 1838	70
4 Nov 1806		Lord William Fitzroy  (to 1812)	1 Jun 1782	13 May 1857	74
		James Mingay   [he was unseated on petition	9 Mar 1752	9 Jul 1812	60
		in favour of Thomas Creevey 4 Feb 1807]
4 Feb 1807		Thomas Creevey  (to 1818)	5 Mar 1768	5 Jun 1838	70
8 Oct 1812		Lord John Edward Fitzroy	24 Sep 1785	28 Dec 1856	71
19 Jun 1818		Lord Charles Augustus Fitzroy  (to 1830)	28 Feb 1791	13 Jun 1865	74
		Nicholas William Ridley-Colborne,later [1839]
		1st Baron Colborne	14 Apr 1779	3 May 1854	75
12 Jun 1826		William Bingham Baring,later [1848] 2nd
		Baron Ashburton	Jun 1799	23 Mar 1864	64
2 Aug 1830		Lord James Henry Fitzroy  (to 1834)	19 Apr 1804	26 Jul 1834	30
		Francis Baring,later [1864] 3rd Baron
		Ashburton	20 May 1800	6 Sep 1868	68
2 May 1831		Alexander Baring,later [1835] 1st Baron
		Ashburton	27 Oct 1774	12 May 1848	73
10 Dec 1832		Francis Baring,later [1864] 3rd Baron
		Ashburton  (to 1841)	20 May 1800	6 Sep 1868	68
8 Aug 1834		Henry Fitzroy,styled Earl of Euston,later [1844]
		5th Duke of Grafton  (to 1842)   [at the general	10 Feb 1790	26 Mar 1863	73
		election on 30 Jun 1841,William Bingham
		Baring received 86 votes and the Earl of
		Euston and Sir James Flower each received
		71 votes. On scrutiny,Euston's vote was
		reduced by 1 and he was declared unduly
		elected on 4 May 1842]
30 Jun 1841		William Bingham Baring,later [1848] 2nd
		Baron Ashburton  (to 1848)	Jun 1799	23 Mar 1864	64
4 May 1842		Sir James Flower,2nd baronet	14 Dec 1794	17 May 1850	55
28 Jul 1847		William Henry Fitzroy,styled Earl of Euston,
		later [1863] 6th Duke of Grafton   (to 1863)	5 Aug 1819	21 May 1882	62
3 Aug 1848		Francis Baring,later [1864] 3rd Baron
		Ashburton	20 May 1800	6 Sep 1868	68
9 Dec 1857		Alexander Hugh Baring,later [1868] 4th
		Baron Ashburton  (to 1867)	4 May 1835	18 Jul 1889	54
21 Apr 1863		Lord Frederick John Fitzroy	4 Apr 1823	12 Feb 1919	95
12 Jul 1865		Robert John Harvey Harvey,later [1868] 1st
		baronet  (to 1868)	16 Apr 1817	19 Jul 1870	53
		For information on the death of this MP,see the
		note at the foot of the page containing details
		of his baronetcy
2 Dec 1867		Edward Strathearn Gordon,later [1876]
		Baron Gordon of Drumearn [L]	10 Apr 1814	21 Aug 1879	65
		CONSTITUENCY DISENFRANCHISED 1868
		THIRSK (YORKSHIRE)
16 Apr 1660		Barrington Bourchier  (to 1661)	c 1627	29 Oct 1695
		William Stanley  [he was also returned for	18 Oct 1640	25 Oct 1670	30
		Liverpool,for which he chose to sit]
		Thomas Harrison
		Double return between Stanley and Harrison.
		Stanley seated 3 May 1660
13 Jul 1660		Charles Kerr,2nd Earl of Ancram [S]	6 Aug 1624	10 Sep 1690	66
c Apr 1661		Sir Thomas Ingram  (to 1673)	23 Jun 1614	13 Feb 1672	57
		Walter Strickland	c 1623	1670
8 Feb 1671		Sir William Frankland,1st baronet  (to 1685)	c 1640	2 Aug 1697
c Jan 1673		Sir William Wentworth	c 1636	Jun 1692
		Election declared void 6 Feb 1673
18 Feb 1673		Sir William Wentworth	c 1636	Jun 1692
		Robert Wharton
		Double return. Wentworth seated 30 Oct 1673
15 Feb 1679		Nicholas Saunderson	c 1657	Dec 1692
15 Feb 1681		Sir William Ayscough	31 Jul 1614	12 Oct 1695	81
26 Mar 1685		Sir Hugh Cholmley,4th baronet	21 Jul 1632	9 Jan 1689	56
		Thomas Frankland,later [1697] 2nd
		baronet  (to 1695)	Sep 1665	30 Oct 1726	61
11 Jan 1689		Richard Staines  (to 1698)	4 Jul 1650	28 Jan 1705	54
29 Oct 1695		Sir Godfrey Copley,2nd baronet  (to 1709)	c 1653	9 Apr 1709
26 Jul 1698		Sir Thomas Frankland,2nd baronet  (to 1711)	Sep 1665	30 Oct 1726	61
6 May 1709		Leonard Smelt	c 1683	30 May 1740
10 Oct 1710		Ralph Bell  (to 1717)		3 Nov 1733
21 Jun 1711		Thomas Worsley	16 Nov 1686	2 Mar 1751	64
1 Sep 1713		Thomas Frankland,later [1726] 3rd baronet	c 1685	17 Apr 1747
		(to 1747)
30 Jul 1717		Thomas Pitt	5 Jul 1653	28 Apr 1726	72
28 Mar 1722		William St.Quintin,later [1723] 4th baronet	c 1699	9 May 1770
17 Aug 1727		Thomas Robinson,later [1761] 1st
		Baron Grantham	24 Apr 1695	30 Sep 1770	75
25 Apr 1734		Frederick Meinhardt Frankland
		(to 1749)	c 1694	8 Mar 1768
12 May 1747		Thomas Frankland,later [1768] 5th baronet	26 Jun 1718	21 Nov 1784	66
		(to 1780)
1 Apr 1749		William Monckton,later [1751] 2nd Viscount
		Galway [I]	c 1725	18 Nov 1772
16 Apr 1754		Roger Talbot	14 Aug 1713	7 Mar 1777	63
30 Mar 1761		Henry Grenville	15 Sep 1717	22 Apr 1784	66
26 Dec 1765		James Grenville,later [1797] 1st Baron
		Glastonbury	6 Jul 1742	26 Apr 1825	82
19 Mar 1768		William Frankland	1720	28 Dec 1805	85
12 Oct 1774		Thomas Frankland,later [1784] 6th baronet	18 Sep 1750	4 Jan 1831	80
12 Sep 1780		Sir Thomas Gascoigne,8th baronet	7 Mar 1745	11 Feb 1810	64
		Beilby Thompson	17 Apr 1742	10 Jun 1799	57
3 Apr 1784		Sir Thomas Frankland,5th baronet	26 Jun 1718	21 Nov 1784	66
		Sir Gregory Page-Turner,3rd baronet  (to 1805)	16 Feb 1748	4 Jan 1805	56
11 Jan 1785		Robert Vyner	27 Jun 1717	19 Jul 1799	82
28 May 1796		Sir Thomas Frankland,6th baronet	18 Sep 1750	4 Jan 1831	80
7 Nov 1801		William Frankland  (to 1806)	26 Jul 1761	10 Jun 1816	54
6 Feb 1805		Richard Neville,later [1825] 3rd Baron
		Braybrooke	26 Sep 1783	13 Mar 1858	74
4 Nov 1806		Robert Greenhill (Greenhill-Russell from 1815),	1763	12 Dec 1836	73
		later [1831] 1st baronet  (to 1832)
		James Topping	26 Apr 1756	12 Jan 1821	64
9 May 1807		William Frankland	26 Jul 1761	10 Jun 1816	54
31 Mar 1815		Sir Robert Frankland,7th baronet  (to 1834)	16 Jul 1784	11 Mar 1849	64
		REPRESENTATION REDUCED
		TO ONE MEMBER 1832
21 Mar 1834		Sir Samuel Crompton,1st baronet	Jul 1785	27 Dec 1848	63
1 Jun 1841		John Bell	6 Aug 1809	5 Mar 1851	41
		For further information on this MP, see the
		note at the foot of this page
21 Mar 1851		Sir William Payne-Gallwey,2nd baronet	1807	19 Dec 1881	74
5 Apr 1880		Lewis Payn Dawnay	1 Apr 1846	30 Jul 1910	64
		NAME ALTERED TO "THIRSK &
		MALTON" 1885
		THIRSK & MALTON (YORKSHIRE)
4 Dec 1885		Lewis Payn Dawnay	1 Apr 1846	30 Jul 1910	64
Jul 1892		John Grant Lawson,later [1905] 1st baronet	28 Jul 1856	27 May 1919	62
23 Jan 1906		Charles William Reginald Duncombe,styled
		Viscount Helmsley,later [1915] 2nd Earl of
		Feversham	8 May 1879	15 Sep 1916	37
12 Feb 1915		Edmund Russborough Turton,later [1926] 1st
		baronet	1 Nov 1857	9 May 1929	71
30 May 1929		Robert Hugh Turton,later [1974] Baron
		Tranmire [L]	8 Aug 1903	17 Jan 1994	90
28 Feb 1974		John Deane Spence	7 Dec 1920	4 Mar 1986	65
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1983
		BUT RE-CREATED 2010
27 May 2010		Anne Caroline Ballingall McIntosh	20 Sep 1954
		[the poll was delayed following the death of
		one of the candidates]
		THORNABY
28 Feb 1974		Ian William Wrigglesworth  [kt 1991]	8 Dec 1939
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1983
		THORNBURY (GLOUCESTERSHIRE)
4 Dec 1885		Edward Stafford Howard  [kt 1909]	28 Nov 1851	8 Apr 1916	64
14 Jul 1886		John William Plunkett,later [1889] 17th
		Baron Dunsany	31 Aug 1853	16 Jan 1899	45
Jul 1892		Charles Edward Hungerford Atholl
		Colston,later [1916] 1st Baron Roundway	16 May 1854	17 Jun 1925	71
26 Jan 1906		Athelstan Rendall	16 Nov 1871	12 Jul 1948	76
15 Nov 1922		Herbert Charles Woodcock	2 Jun 1871	18 Jan 1950	78
6 Dec 1923		Athelstan Rendall	16 Nov 1871	12 Jul 1948	76
29 Oct 1924		Derrick Wellesley Gunston,later [1938]
		1st baronet	26 Feb 1891	13 Jul 1985	94
26 Jul 1945		Joseph Herbert Alpass	2 Feb 1873	31 May 1969	96
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1950
		THORNBURY AND YATE (AVON)
6 May 2010		Steven John Webb	18 Jul 1965
		THURROCK
26 Jul 1945		Leslie Judah Solley	15 Dec 1905	8 Jan 1968	62
23 Feb 1950		Hugh James Delargy	26 Sep 1908	4 May 1976	67
15 Jul 1976		Oonagh Anne McDonald	Feb 1938
11 Jun 1987		Timothy Simon Janman	9 Sep 1956
9 Apr 1992		Andrew Stuart MacKinlay	24 Apr 1949
6 May 2010		Jacqueline Doyle-Price	5 Aug 1969
		TIPPERARY
1801		Francis James Mathew,styled Viscount
		Mathew,later [1806] 2nd Earl of Landaff [I]	2 Jan 1768	12 Mar 1833	65
		John Bagwell	c 1752	21 Dec 1816
17 Nov 1806		Montague James Mathew  (to Apr 1819)	18 Aug 1773	20 Mar 1819	45
		Francis Aldborough Prittie	4 Jun 1779	8 Mar 1853	73
17 Jul 1818		Richard Butler,styled Viscount Caher,later
		[1819] 2nd Earl of Glengall	17 May 1794	22 Jun 1858	64
2 Mar 1819		William Bagwell  (to 1826)	c 1776	4 Nov 1826
8 Apr 1819		Francis Aldborough Prittie  (to 1831)	4 Jun 1779	8 Mar 1853	73
28 Jun 1826		John Hely Hutchinson,later [1832] 3rd Earl of
		Donoughmore [I]	1787	14 Sep 1851	64
21 Aug 1830		Thomas Wyse  (to 1832)	9 Dec 1791	15 Apr 1862	70
12 May 1831		John Hely Hutchinson,later [1832] 3rd Earl of
		Donoughmore [I]	1787	14 Sep 1851	64
8 Aug 1832		Robert Otway-Cave	1 Mar 1796	29 Nov 1844	48
17 Dec 1832		Cornelius O'Callaghan	1809	16 Aug 1849	40
		Richard Lalor Sheil  (to 1841)	17 Aug 1791	25 May 1851	59
21 Jan 1835		Robert Otway Cave  (to 1845)	c 1796	30 Nov 1844
14 Jul 1841		Valentine Maher	1780	Jan 1844	63
10 Feb 1844		Nicholas Maher  (to 1852)		18 Oct 1851
21 Feb 1845		Richard Albert Fitzgerald	1806	c Jun 1847	40
11 Aug 1847		Francis Scully  (to Apr 1857)	1820	18 Aug 1864	44
26 Jul 1852		James Sadleir  [expelled 16 Feb 1857]	c 1815	4 Jun 1881
		For further information on this MP, see the
		note at the foot of this page.
16 Mar 1857		Daniel O'Donoghue  (to Feb 1865)	c 1824	7 Oct 1889
14 Apr 1857		Laurence Waldron  (to Jul 1865)	1811	3 Apr 1875	63
24 Feb 1865		Charles Moore  (to 1869)	1804	15 Aug 1869	65
24 Jul 1865		John Blake Dillon	5 May 1814	15 Sep 1866	52
17 Oct 1866		Charles William White  (to 1875)	9 Sep 1838	15 Oct 1890	52
27 Nov 1869		Jeremiah O'Donovan Rossa    [as a convicted	Sep 1831	29 Jun 1915	83
		felon, he was declared ineligible to sit
		10 Feb 1870]
		For further information on this MP, see the
		note at the foot of this page.
23 Feb 1870		Denis Caulfield Heron	1824	15 Apr 1881	56
14 Feb 1874		William Frederick Ormond O'Callaghan
		(to 1877)	14 Nov 1852	20 Apr 1877	24
16 Feb 1875		John Mitchel   [he was adjudged to be a	3 Nov 1815	20 Mar 1875	59
		convicted felon and thus ineligible to be
		elected 18 Feb 1875. At the subsequent
		by-election held on 13 Mar 1875, he was
		again returned. He died a week later and
		the seat was assigned to Stephen Moore
		(the defeated candidate at the 13 Mar by-
		election) on 27 May 1875]
		For further information on this MP, see the
		note at the foot of this page.
27 May 1875		Stephen Moore  (to 1880)	1836
16 May 1877		Edmund Dwyer Gray	29 Dec 1845	27 Mar 1888	42
8 Apr 1880		Patrick James Smyth  (to Jan 1885)	1823	12 Jan 1885	61
		For further information on this MP, see the
		note regarding John Mitchel at the foot of the
		page containing details of the constituency
		of Tipperary.
		John Dillon	4 Sep 1851	4 Aug 1927	75
23 Mar 1883		Thomas Mayne  (to 1885)	1832
12 Jan 1885		John O'Connor	10 Oct 1850	27 Oct 1928	78
		SPLIT INTO 4 DIVISIONS 1885
		SEE BELOW
		TIPPERARY EAST
2 Dec 1885		Thomas Joseph Condon	1850	Jul 1943	93
14 Dec 1918		Pierce McCann	2 Aug 1882	6 Mar 1919	36
6 Mar 1919		vacant
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1922
		TIPPERARY MID
8 Dec 1885		Thomas Mayne	1832
15 May 1890		Henry Harrison	17 Dec 1867	20 Feb 1954	86
Jul 1892		John McCarthy	1862	8 Feb 1893	30
24 Feb 1893		James Francis Hogan	29 Dec 1855	9 Nov 1924	68
15 Oct 1900		Kendal Edmund O'Brien	1849	21 Nov 1909	60
22 Jan 1910		John Hackett	5 Nov 1865	2 Oct 1940	74
14 Dec 1918		James Aloysius Burke	14 Jun 1893	10 Jun 1967	73
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1922
		TIPPERARY NORTH
Dec 1885		Patrick Joseph O'Brien	1855	10 Jan 1911	55
17 Jan 1906		Michael Hogan	1853
Dec 1910		John Joseph Esmonde	27 Jan 1862	17 Apr 1915	53
18 Jun 1915		John Lymbrick Esmonde,later [1943]
		14th baronet	15 Dec 1893	6 Jul 1958	64
14 Dec 1918		Joseph McDonagh		25 Dec 1922
		CONSTITUENCY ABOLISHED 1922
		Wallace Duffield Wright VC, MP for Tavistock 1928-1931
		Wright was a Lieutenant in the 1st Battalion, Queen's Royal West Surrey Regiment, present
		during the Kano-Sokoto Expedition in Nigeria, when, on 24 March 1903, his actions won
		him the Victoria Cross. The citation in the London Gazette of 11 September 1903 reads:-
		'On March 24, 1903, Lieutenant Wright, with only one officer and 44 men, took up a position
		in the path of the advancing enemy, and sustained the determined charges of 1,000 horse
		and 2,000 foot for two hours, and when the enemy, after heavy losses, fell back in good
		order, Lieutenant Wright continued to follow them up till they were in full retreat. The
		personal example of this officer, as well as his skilful leadership, contributed largely to the
		brilliant success of this affair. He in no way infringed his orders by his daring initiative, as,
		though warned of the possibility of meeting large bodies of the enemy, he had purposely
		been left a free hand.'
		Wright was elected to the House of Commons for the constituency of Tavistock in 1928 and
		sat until he retired at the 1931 general election.
		Jonathan William Patrick Aitken, MP for Thanet East 1974-1983 and
		Thanet South 1983-1997
		Before his downfall, Aitken was once considered to be a candidate for high political office.
		At one stage he had a relationship with Margaret Thatcher's daughter, Carol, but upset Mrs
		Thatcher when he ended the relationship. Mrs Thatcher was further upset when Aitken
		suggested to an Egyptian newspaper that Mrs Thatcher "probably thinks that Sinai is the
		plural of Sinus". As a result, Aitken languished on the backbenches during Thatcher's
		premiership.
		His political career took off under John Major, being appointed Minister of State for Defence
		Procurement in 1992 and he entered the Cabinet as Chief Secretary to the Treasury in
		1994. He resigned from Cabinet in 1995 in order to defend himself against accusations that
		while serving as Minister of State for Defence Procurement he had violated ministerial rules
		by allowing an Arab businessman, Said Ayas, to pay for his stay at the Paris Ritz.
		The Guardian newspaper reported on this story in its edition of 10 April 1995. Aitken then
		took the fatal step of suing the Guardian for libel. In June 1997, just after Aitken had lost
		his seat at the general election, Aitken's action collapsed. His explanation was that his
		wife had paid for the hotel, but it was shown that, at the time, his wife been in Switzerland.
		Aitken was then charged with perjury and perverting the course of justice and received an
		18 month jail sentence, of which he served 7 months.  He was unable to pay for his legal
		costs and was, as a result, declared bankrupt. He is one of the few people to resign from
		membership of the Privy Council, along with John Profumo and John Stonehouse.
		According to "Brewer's Rogues, Villains Eccentrics" by William Donaldson (Cassell, London
		2002), on his release he became a born-again Christian under the influence of the Reverend
		Nicky Gumbel, a charismatic preacher practising at the Holy Trinity Church in Brompton,
		London. At Gumbel's so-called Alpha courses participants make animal noises and then fall
		over backwards. Other converts include Samantha Fox, the former topless model.
		For further reading see the Guardian's webpage at http://www.guardian.co.uk/aitken
		and also refer to "The Liar" by Luke Harding, Davie Leigh and David Palister (Penguin 1997)
		Jabez Spencer Balfour, MP for Tamworth 1880-1885 and Burnley 1889-1893
		The following is extracted from an article by David McKie titled 'House of Scandal' which was
		published in 'The Guardian' on 13 March 2004.
		…..Jabez Spencer Balfour [was] Liberal member for Tamworth from 1880 to 1885 and for
		Burnley from 1889 until things came badly unstuck. The institution that made him was the
		Liberator Building Society - a name designed to entice nonconformist England and Wales,
		since it echoed that of the Liberation Society, the principal voice of nonconformity against
		the established church. That appeal was compounded by employing nonconformist ministers
		desperate to augment their pitiful wages as agents of Balfour's Society. Exuding this odour
		of sanctity, the Liberator soon became the biggest building society in the land, ringed with
		satellite companies, and in time its own bank.
		Increasingly, Balfour turned his hand to big prestige projects in central London, including the
		building of what he intended to be the biggest hotel in Europe. His reputation in the City
		rose to a point where companies eager to better themselves were glad to take this man with
		the golden touch on board. In his home town, Croydon, his reputation as its leading citizen
		was confirmed when in 1883 the place achieved borough status. Though not a councillor,
		Balfour was invited to accept nomination as mayor - a choice he repaid with lavish banquets
		and parties at his fine house in Wellesley Road and in its handsome garden. Though he
		modestly disclaimed any such ambition, his real aim was to be MP for Croydon - so much
		handier for his interests at Westminster and in the City than Tamworth, a constituency that
		in any case was destined to disappear in a redistribution of seats. [This is not strictly
		correct - Tamworth was to lose one of its two members under the Reform Act of 1884].
		But he lost in the General Election of 1885; and to add to his humiliation, local Tories
		arranged to have the Dead March From Saul played outside his house. Thereafter, he gave
		up on Croydon, installing himself at grand addresses in London and buying most of the
		village of Burcot near Abingdon, where he entertained on a lavish scale and lorded it as
		squire.
		But his empire's apparent success was built on illusion. The profits Balfour's companies
		signalled at the close of each year with handsome dividends and bonuses for the directors,
		were almost entirely fictitious. Very few of his schemes made any money; his real gift was
		in cooking the books. And as the 1890s progressed, suspicions began to grow. The
		'Financial Times' and 'The Economist' warned investors against him. But too late. In
		September 1892, the portrait of Jabez Spencer JP MP that hung in an honoured place on the
		wall of the Croydon Liberal Club inexplicably crashed to the floor. Within days, his bank, and
		thereafter all the companies with which it was linked, met the same fate.
		Resigning his seat at Burnley, Balfour pledged himself to a reconstruction which he promised
		would largely avert the catastrophe that shareholders and investors feared. But it soon
		became clear that the scale of his debts made rescue impossible. Thousands were ruined;
		suicides were regularly reported; people who had saved for old age in the hope of avoiding
		the workhouse found themselves now condemned to it. When the police arrested two of
		his main subordinates, Balfour vanished. Claims to have seen him came in from around the
		world. In fact, he was 7,000 miles away in Argentina - a country, he had established, with
		which Britain had no arrangements for extradition.
		Eventually, Balfour was traced to the town of Salta, not far from the border with Chile. Here
		he had set up house with the daughter, half his age, of a business colleague called Henry
		Freeman. After Freeman's death, this daughter had been regarded as Balfour's ward; now
		they were living together as Mr and Mrs Samuel Butler. The great champion of temperance
		was engaged in buying a brewery. Though the Argentinean government was sympathetic to
		British attempts to recapture the fugitive, nothing could be done except through an
		extradition treaty. But here Balfour had read things wrongly. Though no treaty existed, one
		had been agreed, and was waiting for ratification. And in due course the Argentinean
		parliament made it law.
		Balfour and his supporters now hit on a new and ingenious tactic. It was stipulated in
		Argentinean law that no one could leave the country if litigation was pending against him.
		Very well: the friends of Balfour would organise themselves into a rota and sue him one by
		one.
		At this point, some of London's men in Buenos Aires despaired of ever getting Balfour back.
		Better, perhaps, they said, to forget the whole thing. But the extradition expert at Scotland
		Yard, Inspector Frank Froest, had other ideas. Dispatched by the police commissioner with
		instructions not to come back until he had Balfour in handcuffs - he should expect, he was
		told, a stay of around five years - he soon found a way of breaking the deadlock.
		What had happened before was that judgments given in Buenos Aires in favour of Balfour's
		return were consistently blocked by local officials in Salta, not least because local people
		believed that having this famous English financier among them was set to bring them
		prosperity. The answer Froest devised, as he boasted to his family later, amounted to
		kidnap. He commissioned a train, concealed it in sidings not far from Salta, waited until the
		federal courts had given their latest ruling in favour of extradition - and then had Balfour
		aboard the train before Salta officials knew what was happening.
		They were hardly out of town before a posse on horseback set off in pursuit, armed with a
		warrant for the return of Balfour and the arrest of Inspector Froest. As the train thundered
		southwards, the inspector, who had stationed himself on the footplate to prevent any delay,
		saw the horsemen approaching. One detached himself and rode his horse on to the track
		ahead of the train, waving his warrant and calling on the driver to stop. But Froest
		obstructed the driver by throwing himself across the controls. The train surged on at
		undiminished speed and struck down and killed both the horse and the rider. Later, the
		British government offered $50 as compensation, stipulating that this must cover both the
		man and the horse.
		Back in Buenos Aires, there were further foiled attempts at a rescue before Balfour was
		taken home, in handcuffs, on the boat 'Tartar Prince.' In November 1895, he was sentenced
		to 14 years' imprisonment with hard labour. Released in 1906, he began a new career as a
		journalist, writing a series of prison memoirs that led page one of Lord Northcliffe's 'Weekly
		Dispatch' for 26 consecutive weeks. Later, he set up as a mining engineer; later still, at the
		age of 71, Balfour took a post in Burma, but was ordered back to London on the grounds
		that he would not survive in such heat. He returned to a bitter winter, which probably killed
		him.
		He died in February 1916 on a train taking him, at 72, to south Wales to begin a new job at
		Morriston Colliery. Twenty years earlier, Balfour had been the most notorious man in the
		land, burned in effigy on bonfire night after his companies crashed. Now, until they examined
		his papers, no one knew who he was.
		For further reading see 'Jabez; the Rise and Fall of a Victorian Rogue' by David McKie
		(Atlantic Books, London, 2004)
		Lord William Russell, MP for Surrey 1789-1807 and Tavistock 1807-1819
		and 1826-1830
		Lord William Russell was murdered in his bed by his valet, Francois Benjamin Courvoisier
		on 6 May 1840. The following is Courvoisier's entry in "The Newgate Calendar":-
		'On the morning of Wednesday, the 6th of May, 1840, Lord William Russell, an aged member
		of the illustrious house of Bedford, was discovered to have been murdered in his bed, at his
		house, No. 14 Norfolk Street, Park Lane. The deceased was the posthumous child of Francis,
		Marquis of Tavistock, eldest son of the fourth Duke of Bedford, by Lady Elizabeth Keppel,
		daughter of the second Earl of Albemarle. He was the third and youngest brother of the two
		late Dukes of Bedford, and uncle of the existing duke, who was the seventh of the family
		of the family who had succeeded to the title. He was uncle also to the noble and highly
		talented Lord John Russell, who at the time of this most melancholy catastrophe held the
		office of Secretary of State for Colonial Affairs. By his marriage with Lady Charlotte Villiers,
		eldest daughter of the fourth Earl of Jersey, his lordship had seven children, several of
		whom were still alive and were married into other noble families; but at the time of his death
		he was a widower, his wife having died in the year 1806. His lordship was born in August,
		1767, and was consequently in the seventy-third year of his age.
		'Lord William Russell resided, attended only by his servants, at the house in Norfolk Street,
		Park Lane. His household consisted of two female servants - a housemaid, Sarah Mancer,
		and a cook, Mary Hannell - his valet, Francois Benjamin Courvoisier, and a coachman and
		groom, all of whom lived in the house, with the exception of the two latter individuals. The
		house was small, and consisted of only two rooms on a floor. On the basement storey were
		the kitchen and the usual offices, and a room used by Courvoisier as a pantry. On the
		ground floor were two parlours, used as dining-rooms; on the first floor were the bedroom
		and dressing-room of his lordship, and in the storey above were the sleeping apartments of
		the servants. His lordship was a member of Brooks's Club, in St. James's Street, and usually
		spent a considerable portion of the day there, but he generally dined at home, and then,
		having passed several hours in reading, commonly retired to rest at about twelve o'clock.
		The valet had been in his lordship's service for a period of only five weeks, and in the course
		of that time had been heard by his fellow-servants to express himself in terms of dislike to
		his master, whom he described as testy and dissatisfied, and to declare that if he only had
		his money he should soon return to Switzerland, of which country he was a native.
		'On the 5th of May his lordship rose at nine o'clock, and breakfasted at the usual hour, and
		at about noon he went out to go to Brooks's, in accordance with his usual habit. Before he
		quitted the house, however, he called his valet, and gave him several messages to deliver,
		amongst which was one to the coachman to prepare his carriage and be in readiness to
		take him home from his club at five o'clock. Upon Courvoisier going into the kitchen after
		this, he declared his fears that he should forget some of his errands, and when he recounted
		them he omitted that to the coachman. At half-past five his lordship returned home to
		dinner in a cab, and showed some dissatisfaction at the neglect of his servant; but it does
		not appear that he exhibited any such anger as could well excite a feeling of hatred or ill-
		will. Dinner was served at about seven o'clock; coffee was subsequently handed to his
		lordship, and at about nine o'clock he retired to his library. At this time the three house-
		servants only were at home. Some other persons had called in the course of the day, but
		they had all left and now Courvoisier, Sarah Mancer and Mary Hannell only were in the
		house. Hannell had been out, but upon her return Courvoisier admitted her, and it was
		observed that he locked and chained the street door after her entrance. Supper was, at
		about ten o'clock, prepared in the kitchen, and some beer was fetched by Courvoisier,
		but he quitted the house and returned by way of the area, and the gate and kitchen door
		were fastened by Hannell upon his readmission. The means of access to the house from
		the street, therefore, were closed, and the only entrance from the back, on the basement
		storey, was through the pantry.
		'At about half-past ten the women-servants went to bed, leaving Courvoisier to attend
		upon his master, and it was not until half-past twelve o'clock that his lordship rang his
		bell for him to assist him in retiring to his apartment.
		'On the following morning, at about half-past six o'clock, Sarah Mancer, the housemaid,
		rose from her bed, and, having dressed herself, quitted her bedroom. As she passed the
		door of the valet's room she knocked, in order to awake him, and then proceeded
		downstairs. Upon reaching the lower floors of the house she found everything in such a
		state of confusion as to excite a suspicion in her mind that thieves had entered the house
		with a view to the commission of a robbery. She hurried through the drawing-room, the
		parlour and the passage on the ground floor; and there she found the furniture strewed
		about, the drawers and boxes open, and a bundle lying on the ground, as if ready packed
		up to be carried off, while the street door had been unfastened, and was only upon the
		latch. A momentary examination of these matters was sufficient to excite alarm in her mind,
		and, hurrying upstairs again, she repaired to the cook to inform her of what she had seen,
		by whose directions she at once proceeded to the apartment of the valet. Ten minutes had
		scarcely elapsed since she had previously knocked at his door, and half-an-hour was
		ordinarily occupied by him in dressing, but, to her surprise, she now found him dressed and
		ready to descend. Hastily she informed him of what she had witnessed below, and he
		accompanied her downstairs. Upon his seeing the state in which the lower part of the house
		appeared to be, he exclaimed "Oh God! Somebody has robbed us." Mancer now suggested
		the propriety of ascertaining whether anything had occurred to his lordship, and they went
		together to his bedroom.
		'Immediately upon their entrance Courvoisier proceeded to the window to open the shutters,
		but Mancer went to the bedside, and saw the pillow saturated with blood, and his lordship
		lying in bed, dead, with his throat cut. The woman screamed and ran out of the room, then
		rushed from the house and obtained the aid of some neighbours and of the police, by whom
		a surgeon was called in. Upon the entrance of these persons, Courvoisier, whose conduct
		throughout the whole transaction had been of the most singular description, was found
		dreadfully agitated, leaning on the bed where the body of his master lay; and although
		questions were asked him he made no answer, and took no part in the proceedings which
		succeeded. In a few minutes he appeared to recover, and at his suggestion an intimation
		of the occurrence was conveyed to the son of the deceased nobleman, who resided in
		Belgrave Square. When Courvoisier went downstairs he immediately took Sarah Mancer into
		his pantry, pointed to some marks of violence which were perceptible upon the door which
		was open, and remarked: "It was here they entered."
		'The police now took possession of the house, and a minute examination of the premises
		was made, the result of which was a firm conviction in their minds that the murder had been
		perpetrated by an inmate of the house, and that a simulated robbery had been got up. A
		parcel was found to contain many articles of his lordship's property. A cloth cloak, which had
		been hanging up in the hall, was found rolled up, and within it were his lordship's gold opera-
		glass, his gold toothpick, a silver sugar-dredger, a pair of spectacles, a caddy-spoon, and a
		thimble belonging to the cook, but it was remarked that the latter articles were of a nature
		which a thief would rather have put into his pocket than have packed up in so large a
		parcel, and although the drawers of the sideboard in the parlour and of the writing-desk in
		the drawing-room were pulled open, nothing was found to have been extracted. In his
		lordship's bedroom a state of things presented itself which tended to confirm the suspicions
		of the police, and to supply a motive for the crime. His lordship had been in possession of a
		case containing ivory rouleau, which were usually employed to hold gold coins. The boxes
		which belonged to his lordship would hold about five hundred sovereigns, and it had been
		remarked by Courvoisier that although he was entrusted with the keys of his master's
		drawers, his lordship would never permit him to go to this case. Upon examination by the
		police the rouleau case was found to have been opened, and the rouleaux having been
		searched, fruitlessly, for money, they had been placed on one side. The jewel-box and the
		note-case of the deceased had also been opened, and while from the former several articles
		of small value had been taken, from the latter a ten-pound note, known to have been in the
		possession of his lordship, had been carried off. A purse which contained gold had also
		disappeared. These circumstances induced a strong suspicion against Courvoisier, and his
		boxes were searched, but nothing was discovered which tended to fix upon him the guilt of
		the crime, but it was nevertheless thought advisable that he should remain under
		surveillance
		'On Friday, the 8th of May, a police officer examined the floor, the skirting-board and the
		sink, and behind the skirting board he found five gold rings, the property of his lordship. In
		the same place were also found five pieces of gold coin and a piece of wax. Behind another
		part of the skirting-board was found a Waterloo medal, which was known to have been in
		the possession of his lordship, with a ribbon attached to it; and there was also found the
		ten-pound note which has been mentioned before. The fact of the discovery of this note
		was a most important feature of the case. If it had been removed from the note-case, in
		which it had been placed, by any ordinary thief, it would undoubtedly have been carried
		off by him. Found as it was, however, concealed behind the skirting-board of the pantry,
		it was taken as almost conclusive proof of the guilt of the valet, because no hand but his
		could have placed it in that position; for it was proved that, from the moment of the
		discovery of the murder, he was placed under surveillance, and could not therefore, have
		conveyed away anything from the house. A further search was subsequently made, and a
		split gold ring, on which his lordship kept his keys, and which had been attached to his
		watch by a ribbon, was found, and then, on the evening of the next day, a locket was
		taken from Courvoisier's pocket; it contained a small portion of the hair of the nobleman's
		deceased lady. A short time before his murder he had missed this relic, to which he
		attached great value. Upon this the police thought fit to take Courvoisier into custody, and,
		after he had been taken off, still further discoveries were made. On the 11th of May a
		chased gold key was discovered, and on Wednesday, the 13th, it was determined to
		examine the sink in the pantry. A part of the sink was covered with lead, and when that
		portion had been removed in the course of the investigation, it occurred to the police
		officer that there was something extraordinary in the appearance of the lead. He turned it
		up, and there he found the watch which had been placed at the noble lord's bed-head on
		the night of the murder, but which, the next morning, was discovered to have been
		removed.
		'These were the material facts adduced in evidence against Courvoisier upon his various
		examinations before the magistrates; but strong as were the suspicions excited against
		him, it was felt that there was still good reason to believe that he would escape conviction.
		An experienced attorney, Mr. Flower, was engaged to conduct his defence, and so strong
		a feeling had been excited in his behalf that a liberal subscription was raised among the
		foreign servants in London to defray the expenses of employing the necessary counsel to
		to appear for him at his trial. Mr. Hobler, an attorney, was engaged on behalf of the
		prosecution, and at length, on Thursday, the 18th of June, the trial of the prisoner came on
		at the Central Criminal Court, before Lord Chief Justice Tindal and Mr. Baron Parke. The
		prisoner, who was an alien, elected to be tried by a jury of Englishmen, and when the
		indictment was read he pleaded not guilty.
		'Evidence in proof of the circumstances which we have detailed was then produced, and
		the first day's proceedings had closed when new and important testimony, affording
		conclusive proof of the guilt of the prisoner, was discovered.
		'In the course of inquiries which had been made subsequent to the murder, some articles
		of plate were found to have been removed from the house of his lordship, but after the
		minute examination of the house which took place, there was good reason to believe that
		this portion of the transaction had occurred long before, and not after, the murder. All the
		efforts of the police to discover this stolen property had proved ineffectual; and, although
		large rewards had been offered for its production, it was not until the evening of the first
		day's trial that it was brought forward. An intimation was then conveyed to Mr. Hobler of
		the fact of its being in the possession of Madame Piolaine, the keeper of a French hotel in
		Leicester Place, Leicester Square, and when it was inspected by persons who were
		competent to speak to its identity, they at once most positively proved that it was the
		same which had been formerly in the possession of his lordship. The circumstances of this
		most extraordinary discovery was directly notified to the prisoner's attorney; and when
		Courvoisier was by him consulted as to the truth of the allegations made, he at once
		admitted his guilt.
		'At this stage of the proceedings it was felt that such a confession placed the advocates
		who had been employed on his behalf in a condition of the greatest difficulty. For them to
		have thrown up their briefs would have been at once to admit the uselessness of any
		efforts to save their client from an ignominious death - a duty to the performance of which
		they had pledged themselves; and it was therefore determined that they should continue
		their defence of the prisoner; although the line of conduct which it became proper to pursue
		was necessarily much altered by the discovery which had been made to them. The
		instructions which they had originally received went to the extent of calling upon to
		endeavour to procure the implication of the female servants of his lordship, and of the
		police, who were to be charged as their companions and associates in crime in the murder
		of Lord [William] Russell, and in a conspiracy to secure the conviction and execution of
		the valet; but although the former portion of this defence was of course deemed fit to be
		withdrawn, a considerable degree of abuse was heaped upon the police by Mr. C. Phillips
		in his speech for the defence of the prisoner, in consequence of some improper conduct
		of which, he alleged, they had been guilty, tending to prejudice his case, and even going
		to the length of fabricating evidence to excite suspicion in the minds of the jury against him.
		'Mr. C. Phillips addressed the jury at very great length on the part of the prisoner; he
		contended with great talent that the evidence was that of suspicion only. Lord Chief Justice
		Tindal having summed up, a verdict of guilty was returned, and the learned judge passed
		upon the prisoner the sentence of death.
		'On the following day the wretched man made a confession, in which he said, "His lordship
		was very cross with me and told me I must quit his service. As I was coming upstairs from
		the kitchen I thought it was all up with me; my character was gone, and I thought it was
		the only way I could cover my faults by murdering him. This was the first moment of any
		idea of the sort entering my head. I went into the dining-room and took a knife from the
		sideboard. I do not remember whether it was a carving-knife or not. I then went upstairs.
		I opened his bedroom door and heard him snoring in his sleep; there was a rushlight in his
		room burning at this time. I went near the bed by the side of the window, and then I
		murdered him. He just moved his arm a little; he never spoke a word."
		'The execution was carried out at Newgate, on the 6th of July, 1840.'
		John Bell, MP for Thirsk 1841-1851
		In July 1849, a commission was held to determine the state of mind of John Bell, the sitting
		MP for Thirsk. The following account of the proceedings is taken from the "Daily News" of
		10 July 1849, having been reprinted from the "Yorkshire Gazette."
		'After the jury had been sworn in and the Commissioner had explained the nature of the
		inquiry, 'Mr Blanshard, who appeared as counsel on behalf of the petitioners, stated the
		case. The petitioners, he said, were Mrs McBean and Mrs Dainton, sisters and co-heiresses
		of Mr Bell, who had for some time represented the borough of Thirsk in parliament. He was
		a gentleman who had enjoyed in Thirsk and the neighbourhood great consideration and
		popularity, and he was sure that the jury would all feel that the object of this inquiry was
		for his comfort. It would be perfectly clear that this investigation had been originated for
		the purpose of protecting Mr Bell and his property, and that he might be surrounded by
		those comforts which he had hitherto enjoyed. The law was perfectly clear, too. It was
		different to what it was fifty years ago. The same power by which this commission issued
		was able to remove it, if, as was not very likely, Mr Bell should be restored to full health,
		so that he could again enjoy his property and have unbounded liberty; the same power
		which imposed could take away the restriction. He should not only adduce medical evidence
		respecting the untoward and unfortunate circumstance which called the together, but also
		the testimony of parties who had been about Mr Bell's person. He should first call a gentle
		man of high consideration in this neighbourhood - Mr Serjeantson, of Kirby Knowle, who
		would speak to the delusions under which Mr Bell laboured and to his state of health
		generally up to a late period. He should also call Mr Bell's butler, and Mr Milligan, a person
		who had been accustomed to the care of lunatics, and who had been about the person of
		Mr Bell, under an assumed guise. The jury would also have before them Dr Ryott, and two
		physicians from York, Dr Belcombe and Dr Simpson, all professional gentlemen of consider-
		able eminence. From these sources the jury would find that Mr Bell did labour under extra-
		ordinary delusions - one of the most prevalent ones being that he was a bird. Sometimes he
		fancied himself to be an eagle, and made motions with his arms, as if endeavouring to raise
		himself from the ground to fly. Again, he supposed, and would not be persuaded to the
		contrary, that iodine was put in his tea. Sometimes he suspected his sister, and sometimes
		said it was done down stairs by the cook, or some of the servants. And his fatuity is such
		that, when dinner is announced, he will forget his way down stairs, and sometimes be found
		in his dressing room; and on one or two occasions, when seated at dinner with Mr and Mrs
		McBean, he has fancied himself in his dressing room, and begun to undress himself - all
		showing that for some time  he has been in an unsound state of mind and labouring under
		delusions. He is sometimes violent, strikes his keeper, and screams out, without any cause.
		He is subject to fits of paroxysm of this sort, frequently requiring restraint, and then, when
		these fits have passed off, he is quiet and tractable.'
		'A succession of witnesses was then called, each of whom testified concerning Bell's mental
		state, repeating his belief that he was a bird. Bell also told his relatives and acquaintances
		that, while he was a bird, he could fly much better than a bird, because he kept his
		shoulders oiled.'
		After the medical witnesses unanimously agreed that Bell was totally incompetent of caring
		for himself, the jury returned its verdict that Bell was of unsound mind. Notwithstanding this
		verdict, no action could be taken regarding Bell's membership of the House of Commons, and
		he remained member for Thirsk until his death in March 1851. It was not until 1886 that the
		passing of the Lunacy (Vacating of Seats) Act enabled insane members to be expelled from
		Parliament. Since that time, as far as I am aware, the provisions of this Act have been
		invoked on only one occasion, when Charles Leach, the member for Colne Valley, was
		thrown out of Parliament in August 1916.
		James Sadleir, MP for Tipperary 1852-1857
		James Sadleir was the younger brother of John Sadleir, MP for Carlow 1847-1853 and Sligo
		1853-1856 (qv under Carlow).
		James was elected as MP for Tipperary in 1852. At the time, he was also the Managing
		Director and Chairman of the Tipperary Bank, which had been founded by his brother John.
		In February 1856, the bank collapsed and John committed suicide. Even though John had, in
		a letter to James' wife, absolved James of all blame, James was left to carry the can. The
		bank's creditors began to take legal action against James to recover their losses. Initially
		James had the sympathy of the public, but it soon emerged that James was implicated in the
		frauds, being accused of abstracting £250,000 of the bank's stock in a desperate attempt to
		help his brother. As a result, any previous sympathy quickly evaporated. Charges were finally
		brought against James on 18 July 1856, but too late - he had absconded a month earlier, on
		17 June.
		It was speculated that James had fled to New Orleans or South America. When he failed to
		appear to answer the charges against him, he was expelled from the House of Commons on
		16 February 1857. His creditors seized all of his (and his wife's) property and sold it to
		recover their losses.
		On 13 May 1857, the 'Dublin Evening Post' received a letter postmarked Paris from James in
		which he denied involvement in the frauds. This denial was, in turn, disproved by his cousin,
		James Scully, who had also been implicated in the scandal.
		James never returned to England to face justice, living out the remainder of his life in
		Switzerland. In June 1881, James was taking his regular walk on the Zürichberg, a wooded
		hill overlooking Zürich, when a thief attempted to rob him of his gold watch. James resisted
		and was shot dead, his body being found a week later in a thicket by the side of the path.
		For further reading, I recommend 'Prince of Swindlers' by James O'Shea (Geography
		Publications, Dublin, 1999).
		Jeremiah O'Donovan Rossa, MP for Tipperary 1869-1870
		Rossa was born in county Cork, the son of tenant farmers. Inspired by the combination of
		the Great Famine in the 1840s and the Young Irelander rebellion of 1848, Rossa founded
		the Phoenix National Literary Society, essentially a secret society whose aim was to win
		independence from Great Britain, by force of arms if necessary. Two years later, he
		became a member of the Irish Republican Brotherhood, better known as the 'Fenians.'
		As a result of his activities as the manager of the Nationalist newspaper 'The Irish People,'
		he was arrested in 1865 and imprisoned for life on a charge of high treason. While serving
		this sentence, he was elected to the House of Commons in a by-election in November 1869
		for the seat of Tipperary. However, as a convicted felon, he was ruled to be ineligible to
		sit and his election was declared void in February 1870.
		After agreeing to an enforced exile, Rossa was released in 1871 and emigrated to New York.
		From here he organised the 'Dynamite Campaign,' a series of bombings in English cities
		throughout the 1880s. This campaign brought him adoration in Ireland and made him
		infamous in Britain. The British authorities attempted to have him extradited, but without
		success.
		On 9 January 1885, a man named Captain Thomas Phelan, a fellow Irishman, was visiting
		Rossa's office when he received multiple stab wounds in an assassination attempt. Phelan's
		'crime' appears to have been that he allowed an interview to be printed in a Kansas City
		newspaper in which he stated that he had knowledge of some forthcoming bombings.
		Just over three weeks later, on 2 February 1885, Rossa himself was the target for
		assassination. The potential assassin was a young English nurse, named Mrs. Lucille Yseult
		Dudley, who appears to have decided to kill Rossa as revenge for the Fenians'
		bombing campaigns in England.
		Two days before the attempted assassination, Mrs. Dudley had sent Rossa a letter in which
		she stated that she was interested in the Irish cause, but did not care to visit his office.
		She would, therefore, meet him at the corner of Chambers Street and Broadway. After
		meeting her, Rossa and Mrs. Dudley went to a hotel, where they talked. Mrs. Dudley told
		Rossa that she would be able to give him a considerable sum of money if anything good
		could be done in the Irish cause, and that she would call again in two day's time.
		On that day, she again met Rossa on the street corner. She showed him a receipt, which
		he was to sign for the money to be donated, and suggested they go somewhere for the
		purpose of handing over the money. While walking to their destination, Mrs. Dudley suddenly
		stepped back, drew a five-shot revolver and began shooting at Rossa. Only one shot hit
		him, in his back below the left shoulder-blade. She was quickly subdued and taken to the
		nearest police station.
		When questioned, Mrs. Dudley admitted to shooting Rossa, but declined to give her reasons.
		When she inquired about Rossa, she expressed her sorrow that he had only been wounded.
		Rossa himself was taken to hospital, where, ironically, he was placed in the same ward as
		Captain Phelan, who appeared to be pleased that Rossa had been shot. Rossa eventually
		made a full recovery and lived for another 30 years.
		The reaction to the attempted assassination in contemporary newspapers was predictable.
		'The Times' reported that "[Rossa's] wound is not a dangerous one, but this fact causes
		general regret, as it is generally held that he richly deserves to be killed." A number of
		other English newspapers praised Mrs. Dudley as being the re-incarnation of Charlotte
		Corday. On the other hand, contemporary Irish papers described the assassination attempt
		as an outrage and suggested that Dudley was an agent of the British government. In July
		1885 Mrs. Dudley was found to be insane and was lodged in a lunatic asylum.
		John Mitchel. MP for Tipperary February-March 1875
		Mitchel was born in Dungiven, co. Londonderry and from a young age became one of
		Ireland's leading campaigners for independence. It is not the purpose of this note to discuss
		Mitchel's fight for Irish independence, a lengthy summary of which can be found under 'John
		Mitchel' in Wikipedia. Rather, my purpose is to inform readers of Mitchel's escape from
		Australia, whence he had been transported as a convict.
		Suffice to say, therefore, that Mitchel was found guilty of treason felony in May 1848 and
		sentenced to 14 years transportation. Initially, Mitchel was sent to the confusingly-named
		Ireland Island in Bermuda, but his health deteriorated in the tropical environment, and in
		1849 he was transferred to the convict ship Neptune bound for the Cape of Good Hope.
		However, riots among the good citizens of Cape Town over the dumping of convicts in the
		colony caused the Neptune to be diverted to Tasmania, then known as Van Diemen's Land.
		Mitchel landed at Hobart on 7 April 1850. As a political prisoner, he has better treated than
		other prisoners and was soon granted a ticket-of-leave, provided he gave his word of
		honour not to escape from the colony and reported to a police magistrate once a month.
		He settled on a small farm a few miles from the inland town of Bothwell, where several
		convicts were assigned to help him work the property. His wife and family arrived from
		Ireland to join him, and altogether Mitchel led a comfortable life, but he pined to get back
		into the fight for Irish freedom.
		His fellow freedom fighters in Ireland had not forgotten about him, and in 1853 they sent a
		young man by the name of Patrick James Smyth to Hobart. Well supplied with cash, his
		orders were to get Mitchel away to the United States. For his part, Mitchel was eager to
		escape, but he told Smyth that he was a man of honour and could not go back on his
		pledged word not to escape.
		The two considered the situation and agreed on a way out of the impasse. Mitchel decided
		he could escape with honour unsoiled if he formally renounced the ticket-of-leave to a
		magistrate and then immediately fled. Accordingly, on 6 June 1853, Mitchel and Smyth
		galloped into Bothwell where they strode into the Court House and confronted Magistrate
		Davis, who sat in an office with his clerk and an attending constable. Mitchel slapped down
		a letter on the table and ordered Davis to read it. The magistrate saw both men standing
		menacingly before him, hands on the evident revolvers inside their jackets. The note read, 'I
		hereby resign my ticket-of-leave and present myself to be taken into custody.' Mitchel and
		Smyth bade the magistrate good morning and strode to the door. By the time Davis could
		summon assistance, Mitchel and Smyth were galloping out of town.
		A few miles down the road, they changed horses and clothes. Mitchel set off across
		country, hoping to make his way over the mountains to Launceston with the aid of friendly
		landowners. Smyth's job was to throw pursuers off the scent. He galloped to the town of
		Oatlands and noisily asked directions to the coastal town of Spring Bay. As a result, the
		police rushed off on a wild goose chase to Spring Bay, while Smyth sat comfortably in the
		coach bound for Launceston.
		The Governor of Tasmania, Sir William Denison, threw every available man into the hunt for
		Mitchel, who, hidden and guided by farmers who disliked Denison's regime, and who were
		also well paid with Smyth's cash, eventually reached a property not far from Launceston.
		There he received a message from Smyth that the brig Don Juan was to pick him up from a
		deserted beach near the mouth of the Tamar River on the night of 27 June 1853.
		Unfortunately for Mitchel, however, the brig failed to arrive. Miller then hid out on another
		farm while Smyth arranged something else.
		In a few days, word reached him that a passage was booked on the regular Launceston-
		Melbourne steamer for a Catholic priest, Father Macnamara. A parcel of suitable clothing
		next arrived and, donning the disguise, Mitchel set off to board the steamer. Before he got
		to the wharf, he was met by a seaman with a message from the steamer's captain, who
		dared not take the bogus priest aboard. He advised Mitchel to hire a boat and crew to row
		him out to meet the steamer after it had sailed, and he would then be taken aboard.
		Mitchel arranged for this suggestion to take place, but the weather intervened and the
		steamer failed to see them.
		Returning to Launceston, Mitchel bought a ticket to Hobart in the name of Father Blake.
		During the journey, Mitchel was sat next to Tasmania's Attorney-General, but his disguise
		stood the test. Several times they were stopped by police - on these occasions Mitchel
		solemnly blessed his pursuers and wished them luck in their search.
		Arrived at Hobart, Mitchel was secreted in a safe hide-out until 19 July 1853, when, as Mr.
		Wright, he boarded the brig Emma and sailed to Sydney. There he was rejoined by Smyth,
		who had brought with him Mitchel's wife and family. On 2 August 1853, they sailed for San
		Francisco aboard the merchantman, the Orkney Lass.
		News of Mitchel's escape had preceded him. Arriving in America, he was greeted and feted
		by the large Irish population. In New York, Mitchel started a rabid anti-British propaganda
		journal, The Citizen, which attained a wide circulation. He soon became embroiled in the
		controversy over slavery and strangely, for a person with freedom-loving ideals, he
		supported the South.
		In 1861, Mitchel moved to France. He hoped to foment war between France and Britain, so
		that in the resulting turmoil, Ireland could press for self-government. The American Civil War
		broke out while he was in France and he rushed back to aid the Southern cause. His two
		sons were killed during the fighting, while Mitchel worked in an ambulance unit while editing
		a daily paper in his spare time.
		After the war had concluded, Mitchel moved back to New York, where his writings and
		speeches on behalf of the beaten South soon got him into trouble. The military commandant
		of New York at the time, Major General John Adams Dix, had him thrown into prison. Mitchel
		was released after four months, but his health was broken. He started another paper, The
		Irish Citizen, and wrote voluminously on Irish history.
		In the summer of 1874, Mitchel risked a return to his homeland, but shortly thereafter
		returned to America.  At a by-election for the seat of Tipperary in February 1875, Mitchel
		was elected unopposed. The election was immediately declared void on the grounds that
		Mitchel was an escaped felon and a fresh election was held on 13 March 1875. Again
		Mitchel was elected, but a week later he died, thus avoiding any further action by
		Parliament.
		Patrick Smyth, Mitchel's helper in fleeing Tasmania, was also elected to the House of
		Commons, sitting for the constituency of co. Westmeath between 1871 and 1880.
		Copyright @ 2003-2013 Leigh Rayment