PEERAGE
Last updated 19/10/2009
Date Rank Order Name Born Died  Age
COWPER
18 Mar 1718 E 1 Sir William Cowper,3rd baronet 24 Jun 1665 10 Oct 1723 58
Created Baron Cowper 14 Dec 1706,
and Viscount Fordwich and Earl
Cowper 18 Mar 1718
MP for Hertford 1695-1700 and
Bere Alston 1701-1705. Keeper of the Great
Seal 1705. Lord Chancellor 1707-1710 and
1714-1718. Lord Lieutenant Hertford 1710-
1712 and 1715-1722.  PC 1705
10 Oct 1723 2 William Clavering-Cowper 13 Aug 1709 18 Sep 1764 55
Lord Lieutenant Hertford 1744-1764
18 Sep 1764 3 George Nassau Clavering-Cowper 26 Aug 1738 22 Dec 1789 51
MP for Hertford 1759-1761
22 Dec 1789 4 George Augustus Clavering-Cowper 9 Aug 1776 12 Feb 1799 22
12 Feb 1799 5 Peter Leopold Louis Francis Nassau
Clavering-Cowper 6 May 1778 21 Jul 1837 59
21 Jul 1837 6 George Augustus Frederick Cowper 26 Jun 1806 15 Apr 1856 49
MP for Canterbury 1830-1835. Lord
Lieutenant Kent 1846-1856
15 Apr 1856 7 Francis Thomas de Grey Cowper 11 Jun 1834 18 Jul 1905 71
to    Lord Lieutenant of Ireland 1880-1882.
18 Jul 1905 Lord Lieutenant Bedford 1861-1905.  KG 1865
PC 1871
Peerages extinct on his death
COX
24 Jan 1983 B[L] 1 Caroline Anne Cox 6 Jul 1937
Created Baroness Cox 24 Jan 1983
COZENS-HARDY
1 Jul 1914 B 1 Herbert Hardy Cozens-Hardy 22 Nov 1838 18 Jun 1920 81
Created Baron Cozens-Hardy
1 Jul 1914
MP for Norfolk North 1885-1899. Lord
Justice of Appeal 1901-1907. Master of the
Rolls 1907-1918.  PC 1901
18 Jun 1920 2 William Hepburn Cozens-Hardy 25 Mar 1868 25 May 1924 56
MP for Norfolk South 1918-1920
25 May 1924 3 Edward Herbert Cozens-Hardy 28 Jun 1873 22 Oct 1956 83
22 Oct 1956 4 Herbert Arthur Cozens-Hardy 8 Jun 1907 11 Sep 1975 68
to    Peerage extinct on his death
11 Sep 1975
CRAIG OF RADLEY
30 Jul 1991 B[L] 1 David Brownrigg Craig 17 Sep 1929
Created Baron Craig of Radley
30 Jul 1991
Marshal of the RAF. Chief of the Defence
Staff 1988-1991
CRAIGAVON
20 Jan 1927 V 1 Sir James Craig,1st baronet 8 Jan 1871 24 Nov 1940 69
Created Viscount Craigavon 20 Jan 1927
MP for Down East 1906-1918 and Down Mid
1918-1921. Prime Minister of Northern
Ireland 1921-1940  PC [I] 1921  PC [NI] 1922
24 Nov 1940 2 James Craig 2 Mar 1906 18 May 1974 68
18 May 1974 3 Janric Fraser Craig 9 Jun 1941
CRAIGMYLE
7 May 1929 B 1 Thomas Shaw 23 May 1850 28 Jun 1937 87
Created Baron Shaw 22 Feb 1909 for life
and Baron Craigmyle 7 May 1929
MP for Hawick 1892-1909. Solicitor
General for Scotland 1894-1895. Lord
Advocate 1905-1909. PC 1906
28 Jun 1937 2 Alexander Shaw 28 Feb 1883 29 Sep 1944 61
MP for Kilmarnock 1915-1923
29 Sep 1944 3 Thomas Donald Mackay Shaw 17 Nov 1923 30 Apr 1998 74
30 Apr 1998 4 Thomas Columba Shaw 19 Oct 1960
CRAIGTON
3 Nov 1959 B[L] 1 John [Jack] Nixon Browne 3 Sep 1904 28 Jul 1993 88
to    Created Baron Craigton 3 Nov 1959
28 Jul 1993 MP for Govan 1950-1955 and Craigton
1955-1959. Minister of State for Scotland
1959-1964.  PC 1961
Peerage extinct on his death
CRAMOND
23 Feb 1628 B[S] 1 Dame Elizabeth Richardson 3 Apr 1651
Created Baroness of Cramond
23 Feb 1628
3 Apr 1651 2 Thomas Richardson 19 Jun 1627 16 May 1674 46
MP for Norfolk 1660-1674
16 May 1674 3 Henry Richardson Oct 1650 5 Jan 1701 50
5 Jan 1701 4 William Richardson 2 Aug 1654 7 Mar 1719 64
7 Mar 1719 5 William Richardson Feb 1715 29 Jul 1735 20
to    Peerage extinct on his death
29 Jul 1735
CRANBORNE
20 Aug 1604 V 1 Sir Robert Cecil 1 Jun 1563 24 May 1612 48
Created Baron Cecil of Essendon
13 Aug 1603,Viscount Cranborne
20 Aug 1604 and Earl of Salisbury
4 May 1605
See "Salisbury"
--------------------------------------------
V 1 Robert Michael James Cecil 30 Sep 1946
Summoned to Parliament as Viscount
Cranborne and Baron Cecil
Created Baron Gascoyne-Cecil
17 Nov 1999  (qv)
See "Salisbury"
CRANBROOK
22 Aug 1892 E 1 Gathorne Gathorne-Hardy 1 Oct 1814 30 Oct 1906 92
Created Viscount Cranbrook 4 May
1878 and Baron Medway and Earl of
Cranbrook 22 Aug 1892
MP for Leominster 1856-1865 and Oxford
University 1865-1878. President of the
Poor Law Board 1866-1867. Home Secretary
1867-1868. Secretary for War 1874-1878
Secretary of State for India 1878-1880.
Lord President of the Council 1885-1886
and 1886-1892.  PC 1866
30 Oct 1906 2 John Stewart Gathorne-Hardy 22 Mar 1839 13 Jul 1911 72
MP for Rye 1868-1880,Kent Mid 1884-1885
and Medway 1885-1892
13 Jul 1911 3 Gathorne Gathorne-Hardy 18 Dec 1870 23 Dec 1915 45
23 Dec 1915 4 John David Gathorne-Hardy 15 Apr 1900 22 Nov 1978 78
22 Nov 1978 5 Gathorne Gathorne-Hardy 20 Jun 1933
CRANFIELD
16 Sep 1622 B 1 Lionel Cranfield 13 Mar 1575 6 Aug 1645 70
Created Baron Cranfield and Earl of
Middlesex 16 Sep 1622
See "Middlesex"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
4 Apr 1675 B 1 Charles Sackville 24 Jan 1638 29 Jan 1706 68
Created Baron Cranfield and Earl of
Middlesex 4 Apr 1675
See "Middlesex"
CRANLEY
20 May 1776 B 1 George Onslow 13 Sep 1731 17 May 1814 82
17 Jun 1801 V 1 Created Baron Cranley 20 May 1776,
and Viscount Cranley and Earl of
Onslow 17 Jun 1801
See "Onslow"
CRANSTOUN
17 Nov 1609 B [ S ] 1 Sir William Cranstoun 23 Jul 1627
Created Lord Cranstoun 17 Nov 1609
23 Jul 1627 2 John Cranstoun by 1642
by 1642 3 William Cranstoun c 1680
c 1680 4 James Cranstoun c 1700
c 1700 5 William Cranstoun 27 Jan 1727
27 Jan 1727 6 James Cranstoun 8 Jul 1773
8 Jul 1773 7 William Cranstoun 3 Sep 1749 30 Jul 1778 28
30 Jul 1778 8 James Cranstoun 26 Jun 1755 22 Sep 1796 41
22 Sep 1796 9 James Edmund Cranstoun 1784 5 Sep 1818 34
5 Sep 1818 10 James Edward Cranstoun 12 Aug 1809 18 Jun 1869 59
18 Jun 1869 11 Charles Frederick Cranstoun 1811 28 Sep 1869 52
to    Peerage extinct on his death
28 Sep 1869
CRANWORTH
20 Dec 1850 B 1 Sir Robert Monsey Rolfe 18 Dec 1790 26 Jul 1868 77
to    Created Baron Cranworth 20 Dec 1850
26 Jul 1868 MP for Penryn 1832-1839. Solicitor
General 1834 and 1835-1839. Lord
Chancellor 1852-1858 and 1865-1866
PC 1850
Peerage extinct on his death
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
28 Jan 1899 B 1 Robert Thornhagh Gurdon 18 Jun 1829 13 Oct 1902 73
Created Baron Cranworth 28 Jan 1899
MP for Norfolk South 1880-1885 and
Norfolk Mid 1885-1892 and 1895
13 Oct 1902 2 Bertram Francis Gurdon 13 Jun 1877 4 Jan 1964 86
KG 1948
4 Jan 1964 3 Philip Bertram Gurdon 24 May 1940
CRATHORNE
15 Jul 1959 B 1 Thomas Lionel Dugdale,1st baronet 20 Jul 1897 26 Mar 1977 79
Created Baron Crathorne 15 Jul 1959
MP for Richmond 1929-1959. Minister for
Agriculture and Fisheries 1951-1954
PC 1951
26 Mar 1977 2 Charles James Dugdale 12 Sep 1939
Lord Lieutenant N Riding Yorkshire 1999-
CRAVEN
16 Mar 1664 E 1 Sir William Craven Jun 1608 9 Apr 1697 88
to    Created Baron Craven 12 Mar 1627 and
9 Apr 1697 Baron Craven,Viscount Craven and Earl
11 Dec 1665 B 1 of Craven 16 Mar 1664, and Baron
Craven 11 Dec 1665
      Lord Lieutenant Middlesex 1670-1689  PC 1681
On his death all peerages except the Barony
of 1665 became extinct
9 Apr 1697 2 William Craven 24 Oct 1668 9 Oct 1711 42
Lord Lieutenant Berkshire 1702-1711
9 Oct 1711 3 William Craven 1700 10 Aug 1739 39
10 Aug 1739 4 Fulwar Craven 10 Nov 1764
10 Nov 1764 5 William Craven 19 Sep 1705 17 Mar 1769 63
MP for Warwickshire 1746-1764
17 Mar 1769 6 William Craven 11 Sep 1738 27 Sep 1791 53
Lord Lieutenant Berkshire 1786-1791
27 Sep 1791 7 William Craven 28 Sep 1770 30 Jul 1825 54
18 Jun 1801 E 1 Created Viscount Uffington and Earl
of Craven 18 Jun 1801
Lord Lieutenant Berkshire 1819-1825
30 Jul 1825 2 William Craven 18 Aug 1809 25 Aug 1866 57
Lord Lieutenant Warwickshire 1853-1856
25 Aug 1866 3 George Grimston Craven 16 Mar 1841 7 Dec 1883 42
Lord Lieutenant Berkshire 1881-1883
7 Dec 1883 4 William George Robert Craven 16 Dec 1868 10 Jul 1921 52
Lord Lieutenant Warwick 1913-1921
10 Jul 1921 5 William George Bradley Craven 31 Jul 1897 15 Sep 1932 35
15 Sep 1932 6 William Robert Bradley Craven 8 Sep 1917 27 Jan 1965 47
27 Jan 1965 7 Thomas Robert Douglas Craven 24 Aug 1957 22 Oct 1983 26
22 Oct 1983 8 Simon George Craven 16 Sep 1961 30 Aug 1990 28
30 Aug 1990   9 Benjamin Robert Joseph Craven 13 Jun 1989
CRAVEN OF RYTON
21 Mar 1643 B 1 John Craven c 1610 1648
to    Created Baron Craven of Ryton
1648 21 Mar 1643
MP for Tewkesbury 1640-1641
Peerage extinct on his death
CRAWFORD
21 Apr 1398 E[S] 1 Sir David Lindsay c 1360 Feb 1407
Created Earl of Crawford 21 Apr 1398
Feb 1407 2 Alexander Lindsay c 1387 1438
1438 3 David Lindsay 17 Jan 1446
17 Jan 1446 4 Alexander Lindsay Sep 1453
Sep 1453 5 David Lindsay 1440 25 Dec 1495 55
25 Dec 1495 6 John Lindsay 9 Sep 1513
9 Sep 1513 7 Alexander Lindsay c 1443 May 1517
May 1517 8 David Lindsay 27 Nov 1542
27 Nov 1542 9 David Lindsay 20 Sep 1558
20 Sep 1558 10 David Lindsay 1527 Oct 1574 47
Oct 1574 11 David Lindsay 1552 22 Nov 1607 55
22 Nov 1607 12 David Lindsay 8 Mar 1576 Feb 1620 43
Feb 1620 13 Henry Lindsay 1623
1623 14 George Lindsay 1633
1633 15 Alexander Lindsay 1639
1639 16 Ludovic Lindsay Nov 1652
Nov 1652 17 John Lindsay c 1598 1678  
He was created Earl of Lindsay (qv) 1633
1678 18 William Lindsay Apr 1644 6 Mar 1698 53
6 Mar 1698 19 John Lindsay by 1672 Dec 1713
Dec 1713 20 John Lindsay 4 Oct 1702 25 Dec 1749 47
25 Dec 1749 21 George Lindsay-Crawford c 1729 11 Aug 1781
11 Aug 1781 22 George Lindsay-Crawford 31 Jan 1758 30 Jan 1808 49
Lord Lieutenant Fife 1798-1807 and 1807-08
For further information on the claim made for the
peerages, see the note at the foot of this page
30 Jan 1808 23 Alexander Lindsay 18 Jan 1752 27 Mar 1825 73
He succeeded to the Earldom of
Balcarres (qv) 1768. Governor of Jamaica
1794-1801
27 Mar 1825 24 James Lindsay 27 Apr 1783 15 Dec 1869 86
Created Baron Wigan 5 Jul 1826
MP for Wigan 1820-1825
15 Dec 1869 25 Alexander William Crawford Lindsay 16 Oct 1812 13 Dec 1880 68
For further information on this peer, see the note
at the foot of this page.
13 Dec 1880 26 James Ludovic Lindsay 28 Jul 1847 31 Jan 1913 65
MP for Wigan 1874-1880.  KT 1891
31 Jan 1913 27 David Alexander Edward Lindsay 10 Oct 1871 8 Mar 1940 68
MP for Lancashire North 1895-1913.
President of the Board of Agriculture
1916. Lord Privy Seal 1916-1918. Chancellor
of the Duchy of Lancaster 1919-1921.
First Commissioner of Works 1921. Minister
of Transport 1922.  PC 1916  KT 1921
8 Mar 1940 28 David Alexander Robert Lindsay 20 Nov 1900 13 Dec 1975 75
MP for Lonsdale 1924-1940.  KT 1955
13 Dec 1975 29 Robert Alexander Lindsay 5 Mar 1927
Created Baron Balniel (qv) 24 Jan 1975
MP for Hertford 1955-1974 and Welwyn Hatfield
Feb-Oct 1974. Minister of State for Defence
1970-1972. Minister of State for Foreign and
Commonwealth Affairs 1972-1974  PC 1972
KT 1996
CRAWLEY
24 Jul 1998 B[L] 1 Christine Mary Crawley 9 Jan 1950
Created Baroness Crawley 24 Jul 1998
CRAWSHAW
25 Aug 1892 B 1 Sir Thomas Brooks,1st baronet 15 May 1825 5 Feb 1908 82
Created Baron Crawshaw 25 Aug 1892
5 Feb 1908 2 William Brooks 16 Oct 1853 19 Jan 1929 75
19 Jan 1929 3 Gerald Beach Brooks 1 Apr 1884 21 Oct 1946 62
21 Oct 1946 4 William Michael Clifton Brooks 25 Mar 1933 7 Nov 1997 64
7 Nov 1997 5 David Gerald Brooks 14 Sep 1934
CRAWSHAW OF AINTREE
17 May 1985 B[L] 1 Richard Crawshaw 25 Sep 1917 16 Jul 1986 68
to    Created Baron Crawshaw of Aintree
16 Jul 1986 17 May 1985
MP for Toxteth 1964-1983
Peerage extinct on his death
CREMORNE
19 Jun 1785 V[I] 1 Thomas Dawson 25 Feb 1725 1 Mar 1813 88
to    Created Baron Dartrey 28 May 1770,
1 Mar 1813 Viscount Cremorne 19 Jun 1785 and
11 Nov 1797 B[I] 1 Baron Cremorne 11 Nov 1797
On his death the Viscountcy became extinct
whilst the Barony passed to -
1 Mar 1813 2 Richard Thomas Dawson 31 Aug 1788 21 Mar 1827 38
MP for Monaghan 1812-1813
21 Mar 1827 3 Richard Dawson
He was created Earl of Dartrey (qv) in 1866
with which title this peerage then merged
CRETING
27 Jan 1332 B 1 John de Creting after 1332
to    Summoned to Parliament as Lord
after 1332 Creting 27 Jan 1332
The peerage presumably became extinct
on his death
CREW OF STENE
20 Apr 1661 B 1 John Crew 1598 12 Dec 1679 81
Created Baron Crew of Stene
20 Apr 1661
MP for Amersham 1623-1625, Brackley
1626 and 1640-1648, Banbury 1628-1629,
and Northamptonshire 1640 and 1654-1655
12 Dec 1679 2 Thomas Crew 1624 30 Nov 1697 73
MP for Northamptonshire 1656-1658 and
Brackley 1659-1679
30 Nov 1697 3 Nathaniel Crew 31 Jan 1633 18 Sep 1721 88
to    Bishop of Oxford 1671-1674. Bishop of
18 Sep 1721 Durham 1674-1721. Lord Lieutenant Durham
1674-1689 and 1712-1714  PC 1686
Peerage extinct on his death
CREWE
25 Feb 1806 B 1 John Crewe 27 Sep 1742 28 Apr 1829 86
Created Baron Crewe 25 Feb 1806
MP for Stafford 1765-1768 and Cheshire
1768-1806
28 Apr 1829 2 John Crewe 1772 4 Dec 1835 63
4 Dec 1835 3 Hungerford Crewe 10 Aug 1812 3 Jan 1894 81
to    Peerage extinct on his death
3 Jan 1894
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
3 Jul 1911 M 1 Robert Offley Ashburton Crewe-Milnes 12 Jan 1858 20 Jun 1945 87
to    Created Earl of Crewe 17 Jul 1895,
20 Jun 1945 and Earl of Madeley and Marquess of
Crewe 3 Jul 1911
Lord Lieutenant of Ireland 1892-1895.
Lord President of the Council 1905-1908
and 1915-1916. Lord Privy Seal 1908-1911
and 1912-1915. Secretary of State for
India 1910-1915. Secretary of State for
War 1921.  PC 1892  KG 1908. Lord
Lieutenant London 1912-1944
Peerages extinct on his death
CRICHTON
c 1443 B[S] 1 William Crichton 1454
Created Lord Crichton c 1443
Chancellor of Scotland 1439-1443 and
1448-1454
1454 2 James Crichton c 1455
c 1455 3 William Crichton by 1493
to    His peerage was forfeited in 1484
1484
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
29 Aug 1642 B[S] 1 James Crichton c 1620 1665
Created Lord Crichton and Viscount
of Frendraught 29 Aug 1642
See "Frendraught"
CRICHTON OF SANQUHAR
29 Jan 1488 B[S] 1 Sir Robert Crichton c 1495
Created Lord Crichton of Sanquhar
29 Jan 1488
c 1495 2 Robert Crichton 9 Sep 1513
9 Sep 1513 3 Robert Crichton c 1520
c 1520 4 Robert Crichton c 1535
c 1535 5 William Crichton 11 Jun 1550
11 Jun 1550 6 Robert Crichton 1561
1561 7 Edward Crichton 23 May 1569
23 May 1569 8 Robert Crichton 29 Jun 1612
He was hanged for murder - for further
information, see the note at the foot of this page
29 Jun 1612 9 William Crichton
He was created Earl of Dumfries (qv) in
1633 into which title this peerage then
merged
CRICKHOWELL
15 Oct 1987 B[L] 1 Roger Nicholas Edwards 25 Feb 1934
Created Baron Crickhowell for life
15 Oct 1987
MP for Pembroke 1970-1987. Secretary of
State for Wales 1979-1987.  PC 1979
CRISP
28 Apr 2006 B[L] 1 Edmund Nigel Ramsay Crisp 14 Jan 1952
Created Baron Crisp for life 28 Apr 2006
CROFT
28 May 1940 B 1 Sir Henry Page Croft,1st baronet 22 Jun 1881 7 Dec 1947 66
Created Baron Croft 28 May 1940
MP for Christchurch 1910-1918 and
Bournemouth 1918-1940  PC 1945
7 Dec 1947 2 Michael Henry Glendower Page Croft 20 Aug 1916 11 Jan 1997 80
11 Jan 1997 3 Bernard William Henry Page Croft 28 Aug 1949
CROFTON
1 Dec 1797 B[I] 1 Anne Crofton 11 Jan 1751 12 Aug 1817 66
Created Baroness Crofton 1 Dec 1797
12 Aug 1817 2 Sir Edward Crofton,4th baronet 1 Aug 1806 27 Dec 1869 63
27 Dec 1869 3 Edward Henry Churchill Crofton 21 Oct 1834 22 Sep 1912 77
22 Sep 1912 4 Arthur Edward Lowther Crofton 7 Aug 1866 15 Jun 1942 75
15 Jun 1942 5 Edward Blaise Crofton 31 May 1926 13 Jun 1974 48
13 Jun 1974 6 Charles Edward Piers Crofton 27 Apr 1949 27 Jun 1989 40
27 Jun 1989 7 Guy Patrick Gilbert Crofton 17 Jun 1951 25 Nov 2007 56
25 Nov 2007 8 Edward Harry Piers Crofton 23 Jan 1988
CROFTS
18 May 1658 B 1 William Crofts c 1611 11 Sep 1677
to    Created Baron Crofts 18 May 1658
11 Sep 1677 Peerage extinct on his death
CROHAM
8 Feb 1978 B[L] 1 Douglas Albert Vivian Allen 15 Dec 1917
Created Baron Croham 8 Feb 1978
CROMARTIE
1 Jan 1703 E[S] 1 Sir George Mackenzie 1630 17 Aug 1714 84
Created Lord Macleod and Castlehaven
and Viscount of Tarbat 15 Apr 1685,
and Lord Macleod and Castlehaven,
Viscount of Tarbat and Earl of
Cromartie 1 Jan 1703
17 Aug 1714 2 John Mackenzie c 1656 20 Feb 1731
20 Feb 1731 3 George Mackenzie c 1703 28 Sep 1766
to    He was convicted of treason and the
1746 peerage forfeited in 1746
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
21 Oct 1861 E 1 Anne Sutherland-Leveson-Gower 21 Apr 1829 25 Nov 1888 59
Created Baroness Macleod,Baroness
Castlehaven,Viscountess Tarbat and
Countess of Cromartie 21 Oct 1861
25 Nov 1888 2 Francis Sutherland-Leveson-Gower 3 Aug 1852 24 Nov 1893 41
to    On his death the peerage fell into abeyance
24 Nov 1893
25 Feb 1895 3 Sibell Lilian Mackenzie Blunt 14 Aug 1878 20 May 1962 83
Abeyance terminated in her favour 1895
20 May 1962 4 Roderick Grant Francis Mackenzie 24 Oct 1904 13 Dec 1989 85
13 Dec 1989 5 John Ruaridh Blunt Grant Mackenzie 12 Jun 1948
CROMER
8 Aug 1901 E 1 Evelyn Baring 26 Feb 1841 29 Jan 1917 75
Created Baron Cromer 29 Jun 1892,
Viscount Cromer 25 Jan 1899 and
Earl of Cromer 8 Aug 1901
PC 1900  OM 1906
29 Jan 1917 2 Rowland Thomas Baring 29 Nov 1877 13 May 1953 75
PC 1922
13 May 1953 3 George Rowland Stanley Baring 28 Jul 1918 16 Mar 1991 72
Governor of the Bank of England 1961-1966
PC 1966  KG 1977
16 Mar 1991 4 Evelyn Rowland Esmond Baring 3 Jun 1946
CROMWELL
10 Mar 1308 B 1 John de Cromwell c 1335
to    Summoned to Parliament as Lord
c 1335 Cromwell 10 Mar 1308
Peerage extinct on his death
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
28 Dec 1375 B 1 Ralph de Cromwell 27 Aug 1398
Summoned to Parliament as Lord
Cromwell 28 Dec 1375
27 Aug 1398 2 Ralph de Cromwell 1368 1417 49
1417 3 Ralph de Cromwell 1403 4 Jan 1455 52
to    On his death the peerage fell into abeyance
4 Jan 1455 See below for continuation -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
25 Jul 1461 B 1 Sir Humphrey Bourchier 14 Apr 1471
to    Summoned to Parliament as Lord
14 Apr 1471 Cromwell 25 Jul 1461
Peerage extinct on his death
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
9 Jul 1536 B 1 Thomas Cromwell 1485 28 Jul 1540 55
to    Created Baron Cromwell 9 Jul 1536
28 Jul 1540 and Earl of Essex 17 Apr 1540
MP for Taunton 1529-1536. Chancellor
of the Exchequer 1533. Lord Chancellor
1535. Lord Privy Seal 1536  KG 1537
He was attainted and executed when his
peerages were forfeited
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
18 Dec 1540 B 1 Gregory Cromwell 4 Jul 1551
Created Baron Cromwell 18 Dec 1540
4 Jul 1551 2 Henry Cromwell by 1538 20 Nov 1592
20 Nov 1592 3 Edward Cromwell 1560 27 Apr 1607 46
27 Apr 1607 4 Thomas Cromwell 11 Jun 1594 1653 59
He was created Earl of Ardglass (qv) in
1645 into which title this peerage then
merged
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
1490 4 Maud Stanhope 30 Aug 1497
to    Held to have become Baroness Cromwell
30 Aug 1497 (creation of 1375) in 1490. On her death
the peerage again fell into abeyance
16 Jul 1923 5 Robert Godfrey Wolseley Bewicke-Copley 23 May 1893 21 Oct 1966 73
Abeyance terminated in his favour 1923
Lord Lieutenant Leicestershire 1949-1966
21 Oct 1966 6 David Godfrey Bewicke-Copley 29 May 1929 18 Aug 1982 53
18 Aug 1982 7 Godfrey John Bewicke-Copley 4 Mar 1960
CROOK
3 Jul 1947 B 1 Reginald Douglas Crook 2 Mar 1901 10 Mar 1989 88
Created Baron Crook 3 Jul 1947
10 Mar 1989 2 Douglas Edwin Crook 19 Nov 1926 18 Jun 2001 74
18 Jun 2001 3 Robert Douglas Edwin Crook 19 May 1955
CROOKSHANK
13 Jan 1956 V 1 Harry Frederick Comfort Crookshank 27 May 1893 17 Oct 1961 68
to    Created Viscount Crookshank
17 Oct 1961 13 Jan 1956
MP for Gainsborough 1924-1956. Financial
Secretary to the Treasury 1939-1943.
Postmaster General 1943-1945. Minister
of Health 1951-1952. Lord Privy Seal 1952-
1955. PC 1939  CH 1955
Peerage extinct on his death
CROSBIE
22 Jul 1776 V[I] 1 William Crosbie,Baron Brandon May 1716 11 Apr 1781 64
Created Viscount Crosbie 30 Nov 1771
and Earl of Glandore 22 Jul 1776
See "Glandore"
CROSS
19 Aug 1886 V 1 Richard Assheton Cross 30 May 1823 8 Jan 1914 90
Created Viscount Cross 19 Aug 1886
MP for Preston 1857-1862, Lancashire SW
1868-1885 and Newton 1885-1886. Home
Secretary 1874-1880 and 1885-1886.
Secretary of State for India 1886-1892
Lord Privy Seal 1895-1900.  PC 1874
8 Jan 1914 2 Richard Assheton Cross 28 Jan 1882 14 Mar 1932 50
14 Mar 1932 3 Assheton Henry Cross 7 May 1920 5 Dec 2004 84
to    Peerage extinct on his death
5 Dec 2004
CROSS OF CHELSEA
12 Mar 1971 B[L] 1 Arthur Geoffrey Neale Cross 1 Dec 1904 4 Aug 1989 84
to    Created Baron Cross of Chelsea
4 Aug 1989 12 Mar 1971
Lord Justice of Appeal 1969-1971. Lord
of Appeal in Ordinary 1971-1975. PC 1969
Peerage extinct on his death
CROWHURST
11 Jun 1850 V 1 Charles Christopher Pepys,Baron 29 Apr 1781 29 Apr 1851 70
Cottenham
Created Viscount Crowhurst and Earl
of Cottenham 11 Jun 1850
See "Cottenham"
CROWTHER
28 Jun 1968 B[L] 1 Geoffrey Crowther 13 May 1907 5 Feb 1972 64
to    Created Baron Crowther 28 Jun 1968
5 Feb 1972 Peerage extinct on his death
CROWTHER-HUNT
9 Jul 1973 B[L] 1 Norman Crowther Hunt 13 Mar 1920 16 Feb 1987 66
to    Created Baron Crowther-Hunt 9 Jul 1973
16 Feb 1987 Peerage extinct on his death
CUCKNEY
25 Jul 1995 B[L] 1 John Graham Cuckney 12 Jul 1925 30 Oct 2008 83
to    Created Baron Cuckney 25 Jul 1995
30 Oct 2008 Peerage extinct on his death
CUDLIPP
8 Jan 1975 B[L] 1 Hugh Kusman Cudlipp 28 Aug 1913 17 May 1998 84
to    Created Baron Cudlipp 8 Jan 1975
17 May 1998 Peerage extinct on his death
CULLEN
11 Aug 1642 V[I] 1 Charles Cokayne 4 Jul 1602 19 Jun 1661 58
Created Baron and Viscount Cullen
11 Aug 1642
19 Jun 1661 2 Brien Cokayne 12 Sep 1631 Jul 1687 55
Jul 1687 3 Charles Cokayne 15 Nov 1658 30 Dec 1688 30
30 Dec 1688 4 Charles Cokayne 4 Jan 1687 6 Apr 1716 29
6 Apr 1716 5 Charles Cokayne 2 Sep 1710 7 Jun 1802 91
7 Jun 1802 6 Borlase Cokayne 30 Sep 1740 11 Aug 1810 69
to    Peerage extinct on his death
11 Aug 1810
CULLEN OF ASHBOURNE
   
21 Apr 1920 B 1 Brien Ibrican Cokayne 12 Jul 1864 3 Nov 1932 68
Created Baron Cullen of Ashbourne 21 Apr 1920
Governor of the Bank of England 1918-1920
3 Nov 1932 2 Charles Borlase Marsham Cokayne 6 Oct 1912 17 Dec 2000 88
17 Dec 2000 3 Edmund Willoughby Marsham Cokayne 18 May 1916
CULLEN OF WHITEKIRK
17 Jun 2003 B[L] 1 William Douglas Cullen 18 Nov 1935
Created Baron Cullen of Whitekirk
17 Jun 2003
PC 1997  KT 2007
CULLODEN
27 Nov 1801 B 1 Adolphus Frederick 24 Feb 1774 17 Jul 1850 76
Created Baron of Culloden,Earl of
Tipperary and Duke of Cambridge
27 Nov 1801
See "Cambridge"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
31 Mar 1928 B 1 Henry William Frederick Albert 31 Mar 1900 10 Jun 1974 74
Created Baron Culloden,Earl of
Ulster and Duke of Gloucester
31 Mar 1928
See "Gloucester"
CULMORE
12 Jul 1725 B[I] 1 William Bateman c 1695 Dec 1744
Created Baron Culmore and Viscount
Bateman 12 Jul 1725
See "Bateman"
CUMBERLAND
18 Jun 1525 E 1 Henry Clifford,Baron Clifford 1493 22 Sep 1542 49
Created Earl of Cumberland 18 Jun 1525
KG 1537
22 Sep 1542 2 Henry Clifford 1517 8 Jan 1570 52
8 Jan 1570 3 George Clifford 8 Aug 1558 30 Oct 1605 47
KG 1592
30 Oct 1605 4 Francis Clifford 1559 21 Jan 1641 81
MP for Westmorland 1585-1587 and
Yorkshire 1604-1605. Lord Lieutenant
Cumberland, Northumberland and
Westmorland 1611-1639
21 Jan 1641 5 Henry Clifford 28 Feb 1591 11 Dec 1643 52
to    MP for Westmorland 1614 and 1621-1622.
11 Dec 1643 Lord Lieutenant Westmorland and York
1642
Peerage extinct on his death
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
24 Jan 1644 D 1 Prince Rupert,Count Palatine of the Rhine 27 Dec 1619 29 Nov 1682 62
to    Created Earl of Holderness and Duke
29 Nov 1682 of Cumberland 24 Jan 1644
Lord Lieutenant Berkshire 1670 and Surrey
1675. First Lord of the Admiralty 1673  KG 1642
Peerage extinct on his death
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
9 Apr 1689 D 1 George,Prince of Denmark 2 Apr 1653 28 Oct 1708 55
to    Created Baron Ockingham,Earl of
28 Oct 1708 Kendal and Duke of Cumberland
9 Apr 1689
Husband of Queen Anne. KG 1684  PC 1685
Peerages extinct on his death
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
27 Jul 1726 D 1 William Augustus 15 Apr 1721 31 Oct 1765 44
to      Created Baron of Alderney,Viscount
31 Oct 1765 Trematon,Earl of Kennington,Marquess
of Berkhampstead and Duke of
Cumberland 27 Jul 1726
Second son of George II.  KG 1730  PC 1746
Peerage extinct on his death
 
CUMBERLAND AND STRATHEARN
22 Oct 1766 D 1 Henry Frederick 27 Oct 1745 18 Sep 1790 44
to    Created Earl of Dublin and Duke of
18 Sep 1790 Cumberland and Strathearn
22 Oct 1766
PC 1766  KG 1767
For further information on two women who claimed
to be Cumberlan'd daughter and grand-daughter,
see the note at the foot of this page.
Peerage extinct on his death
CUMBERLAND AND TEVIOTDALE
24 Apr 1799 D 1 Ernest Augustus 6 Jun 1771 18 Nov 1851 80
Created Earl of Armagh and Duke of
Cumberland and Teviotdale 24 Apr 1799
Fifth son of George III. KG 1786  KP 1821
King of Hanover 1837-1851
For further information on this peer, see the
note at the foot of this page.
18 Nov 1851 2 George Frederick Alexander Charles
Augustus 27 May 1819 12 Jun 1878 59
King of Hanover 1851-1866.  KG 1835
12 Jun 1878 3 Ernest Augustus William Adolphus
to    George Frederick 21 Sep 1845 14 Nov 1923 78
28 Mar 1919 KG 1878
Deprived of his peerages 1919
CUMBERLEGE
18 May 1990 B[L] 1 Julia Frances Cumberlege 27 Jan 1943
Created Baroness Cumberlege
18 May 1990
CUMRA
14 Apr 1703 B[S] 1 Sir James Stuart 4 Jun 1710
Created Lord Mount Stuart,Cumra and
Inchmarnock,Viscount of Kingarth and
Earl of Bute 14 Apr 1703
See "Bute"
CUNLIFFE
14 Dec 1914 B 1 Walter Cunliffe 4 Dec 1855 6 Jan 1920 64
Created Baron Cunliffe 14 Dec 1914
Governor of the Bank of England 1913-1918
6 Jan 1920 2 Rolf Cunliffe 13 May 1899 24 Nov 1963 64
24 Nov 1963 3 Roger Cunliffe 12 Jan 1932
CUNNINGHAM OF FELLING
27 Jun 2005 B[L] 1 John Anderson Cunningham 4 Aug 1939
Created Baron Cunningham of Felling
27 Jun 2005
MP for Whitehaven 1970-1983 and Copeland
1983-2005. Minister for Agriculture,Fisheries and
Food 1997-1998. Minister for the Cabinet Office
and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster 1998-
1999. PC 1993
CUNNINGHAM OF HYNDHOPE
26 Jan 1946 V 1 Sir Andrew Browne Cunningham,1st baronet 7 Jan 1883 12 Jun 1963 80
to    Created Baron Cunningham of
12 Jun 1963 Hyndhope 15 Sep 1945 and Viscount
Cunningham of Hyndhope 26 Jan 1946
Admiral of the Fleet 1943. KT 1945 OM 1946
Peerages extinct on his death
CURRIE
25 Jan 1899 B 1 Philip Henry Wodehouse Currie 13 Oct 1834 12 May 1906 71
to    Created Baron Currie 25 Jan 1899
12 May 1906 PC 1894
Peerage extinct on his death
CURRIE OF MARYLEBONE
1 Oct 1996 B[L] 1 David Anthony Currie 9 Dec 1946
Created Baron Currie of Marylebone
1 Oct 1996
CURZON OF KEDLESTON
28 Jun 1921 M 1 George Nathaniel Curzon 11 Jan 1859 20 Mar 1925 66
to    Created Baron Curzon of Kedleston
20 Mar 1925 11 Nov 1898 (the last Irish peerage),
Baron Ravensdale,Viscount Scarsdale
and Earl Curzon of Kedleston 2 Nov
1911 and Marquess Curzon of
Kedleston 28 Jun 1921
MP for Southport 1886-1889. Governor
General of India 1898-1905. Lord Privy
Seal 1915-1916. Lord President of the
Council 1916-1919 and 1924-1925. Foreign
Secretary 1919 -1924.  PC 1895  KG 1916
Peerages extinct on his death
CURZON OF PENN
27 Feb 1802 V 1 Assheton Curzon 2 Feb 1730 21 Mar 1820 90
Created Baron Curzon of Penn 13
Aug 1794 and Viscount Curzon of Penn
27 Feb 1802
MP for Clitheroe 1754-1780 and 1792-1794
21 Mar 1820 2 Richard William Penn Curzon-Howe
He was created Earl Howe (qv) in 1821 with
which title this peerage then merged
CUSHENDUN
7 Nov 1927 B 1 Ronald John McNeill 30 Apr 1861 12 Oct 1934 73
to    Created Baron Cushendun 7 Nov 1927
12 Oct 1934 MP for St Augustines 1911-1918 and
Canterbury 1918-1927. Financial Secretary
to the Treasury 1925-1927. Chancellor of
the Duchy of Lancaster 1927-1929. PC 1924
Peerage extinct on his death
CUTTS OF GOWRAN
12 Dec 1690 B[I] 1 John Cutts c 1661 25 Jan 1707  
to    Created Baron Cutts of Gowran
25 Jan 1707 12 Dec 1690
MP for Cambridgeshire 1693-1702 and
Newport IOW 1702-1707. PC [I] 1705
Peerage extinct on his death
Alexander Lindsay, 4th Earl of Crawford ('Old Beardie')
The 4th Earl of Crawford was the most formidable power in Scotland during the middle years
of the 15th century. He was a regular guest at Glamis Castle, where one night on one of his
visits and after an evening of heavy drinking, he demanded a game of cards. By this time it
was late, and the Sabbath was dawning; as a result, no one was prepared to play with him.
Getting progressively more aggressive, Crawford determined that the Sabbath would not
interrupt his pleasures and swore that he would even play the Devil himself.  No sooner had
he said this than a tall man dressed entirely in black entered the room and the Earl, pleased
to have a playing partner, took him into another room where they proceeded to play.
There was much swearing and stamping of feet within the room, and there are some accounts
of the servants' curiosity. One tried to peep into the room through the keyhole, but was
blinded by a bolt of lightning. The Earl stormed out of the room, raging at the servant for
this breach of his privacy. When he turned back to re-enter the room, the man in black had
gone, taking the Earl's soul with him. Five years later, the man in black reappeared and
the Earl died, reclaimed by the Devil according to the story.
It is said that visitors to Glamis Castle can hear, behind one of the walls of the Castle crypt,
the sounds of rolling dice, swearing and the stamping of feet, the sounds of the Earl playing
until the Day of Judgment.
The Crawford Peerage Claim 1809-1839
The following account of the claim is taken from an anonymously written book titled "Celebrated
Claimants Ancient and Modern" published by Chatto and Windus, London, 1873.
'In 1808, George Lindsay Crawfurd, twenty-second Earl of Crawfurd and sixth Earl of Lindsay,
died without issue, and his vast estates descended to his sister, Lady Mary Crawford. After
the death of the earl various claims were advanced to the peerage, one of them being
preferred by a person of the name of John Crawfurd, who came from Dungannon, in the north
of Ireland. When this claimant arrived at Ayr, in January 1809, he gave himself out as a
descendant of the Hon. James Lindsay Crawfurd, a younger son of the family, who had taken
refuge in Ireland from the persecutions of 1666-1680. At first he took up his abode at the inn
of James Anderson, and from his host and a weaver named Wood he received a considerable
amount of information respecting the family history. From Ayr he proceeded to visit Kilbirnie
Castle, once the residence of the great knightly family of Crawfurd. The house had been
destroyed by fire during the lifetime of Lady Mary's grandfather, and had not been rebuilt--the
family taking up their residence on their Fifeshire estates. At the time of the fire, however,
many family papers and letters had been saved, and had been stored away in an old cabinet,
which was placed in an out-house. To these Mr. Crawfurd obtained access, and found among
them many letters written by James Lindsay Crawfurd, whose descendant he pretended to be.
He appropriated them and produced them when the fitting time came. At Kilbirnie he also
introduced himself to John Montgomerie of Ladeside, a man well acquainted with the family
story and all the vicissitudes of the Crawfords; and one who was disposed to believe any
plausible tale. The farmer, crediting the pretender's story, spread it abroad among the villagers,
and they in turn fell into ecstacies over the idea of a poor man like themselves arriving at an
earldom, rebuilding the ancient house of Kilbirnie, and restoring the old glories of the place.
Their enthusiasm was turned to good account. The claimant was very poor, and stood in need
of money to prosecute his claim, and he made no secret of his poverty or his necessities, and
promised large returns to those who would help him in his time of need. "Farms," we are told,
"were to be given on long leases at moderate rents; one was to be a factor, another
chamberlain, and many were to be converted from being hewers of wood and drawers of
water to what they esteemed the less laborious, and therefore more honourable, posts of
butlers and bakers, and body servants of all descriptions." These cheering prospects, of course,
depended upon the immediate faith which was displayed, and the amount of assistance which
was at once forthcoming. Therefore, each hopeful believer exerted himself to the utmost, and
"poor peasants and farmers, cottagers and their masters, threw their stakes into the claimant's
lucky-bag, from which they were afterwards to draw 'all prizes and no blanks.'" Men of loftier
position, also, were not averse to speculate upon the chances of this newly-discovered heir.
Poor John Montgomerie gave him every penny he had saved, and every penny he could borrow,
and after mortgaging his little property, was obliged to flee to America from his duns, where, it
is said, he died. His son Peter, who succeeded to Ladeside, also listened to the seductive voice
of the claimant, until ruin came upon him, and he was compelled to compound with his creditors.
'In due time the pretender to the Crawford peerage instituted judicial proceedings. His
advocates brought forward some very feasible parole evidence; but they mainly rested their
case upon the documents which had been discovered in the old cabinet at Kilbirnie. These
letters, when they were originally discovered, had been written on the first and third pages;
but in the interim the second pages had been filled up in an exact imitation of the old hand with
matter skilfully contrived to support the pretensions of the new-comer. In these interpolations
the dead Crawfurd was made to describe his position and circumstances in Ireland, his marriage,
the births of his children, and his necessities, in a manner which could leave no doubt as to the
rightful claims of the pretender. Unfortunately for his cause, he refused to pay his accomplices
the exorbitant price which they demanded, and they, without hesitation, made offers to Lady
Mary, into the hands of whose agents they confided the forged and vitiated letters. The result
was that a charge of forgery was brought against the claimant, and he and his chief abettor,
James Bradley, were both brought to trial before the High Court of Justiciary, in February 1812,
and were sentenced to fourteen years' transportation. This result was obtained by the
acceptance of the evidence of Fanning, one of the forgers, as king's evidence. While under
sentence the claimant wrote a sketch of his life ["Sketch of the Life of John Lindsay Crawfurd,
Esq., containing a full and impartial account of his claim to the title and estates of George,
Earl of Crawfurd and Lindsay. With an account of his trial for forgery….Written by himself"
Dairy, 1812] which was printed at Dairy, in Ayrshire, and was published before the sentence
was carried into execution. After some delay the sham earl was shipped off to Botany Bay, and
arrived in New South Wales in 1813. Many persons in Scotland continued under the belief that
he had been harshly treated, and had fallen a victim to the perjured statements of witnesses
who were suborned by Lady Mary Crawford. It was not disputed that the documents which had
been put in evidence really were forged; but it was suggested that the forgery had been
accomplished without his knowledge, in order to accomplish his ruin. Public feeling was aroused
in his favour, and he was regarded not only as an innocent and injured man, but as the rightful
heir of the great family whose honours and estates he sought.
'During his servitude in Australia, John Lindsay Crawfurd contrived to ingratiate himself with
MacQuarrie [sic - Macquarie], the governor of New South Wales, and got part of his punishment
remitted, returning to England in 1820. He immediately recommenced proceedings for the
recovery of the Crawfurd honours; and, as his unexpected return seemed to imply that he had
been unjustly transported, his friends took encouragement from this circumstance, and again
came forward with subscriptions and advances. Many noblemen and gentlemen, believing him
to be injured, contributed liberally to his support and to the cost of the proceedings which he
had begun. At last the case came,--and came under the best guidance--before the Lords
Committee of Privileges, to which it had been referred by the king. Lord Brougham was counsel
in the cause, and he publicly expressed his opinion that it was extremely well-founded. Many of
the claimant's adherents, however, were deterred from proceeding further in the matter by the
unfavourable report of two trustworthy commissioners who had been appointed to investigate
the affair in Scotland. On the other hand, Mr. Nugent Bell, Mr. William Kaye, and Sir Frederick
Pollock, with a host of eminent legal authorities, predicted certain success. Thus supported,
the pretender assumed the rôle of Earl of Crawfurd, and actually voted as earl at an election
of Scotch peers at Holyrood. Unfortunately for all parties, the claimant died before a decision
could be given either for or against him. His son, however, inheriting the father's pretensions,
and also apparently his faculty for raising money, contrived to find supporters, and carried on
the case. Maintaining his father's truthfulness, he declared that his ancestor, the Hon. James
Lindsay Crawfurd, had settled in Ireland, and that he had died there between 1765 and 1770.
leaving a family, of which he was the chief representative. On the other hand, Lord Glasgow,
who had succeeded by this time to the estates, insisted that the scion of the family who was
supposed to have gone to Ireland, and from whom the pretender traced his descent, had in
reality died in London in 1745, and had been buried in the churchyard of St. Martin's-in-the-
Fields. It was finally proved that a record remained of the death of James Lindsay Crawfurd
in London, as stated, and 120 genuine letters were produced in his handwriting bearing a
later date than that year. The decision of the House of Lords was--"That from the facts now
before us we are satisfied that any further inquiry is hopeless and unnecessary." This opinion
was given in 1839, and since that time no further steps have been taken to advance the claim.
Strange to say, Lord Glasgow allowed the body of the original claimant to be interred in the
family mausoleum; and it has been more than suggested that if John Lindsay Crawfurd was not
the man that he represented himself to be, he was at least an illegitimate offshoot of the same
noble house, and that had he been less pertinacious in advancing his claims to the earldom, he
might have ended his days more happily.'
Alexander William Crawford Lindsay, 25th Earl of Crawford
and 8th Earl of Balcarres
A man who was infinitely more famous in death than he ever was in life…..
The 25th Earl died in Florence, Italy in December 1880. His body was embalmed by an Italian
chemist, laid in an Italian-wood shell and sheathed in lead. To make doubly sure, two further
wooden coffins were added. With these elaborate precautions completed, the Earl's body
began its long journey home.
Traditionally, the Earls of Crawford and Balcarres were buried at Haigh Hall in Lancashire, but
the vault was full. A new mortuary chapel had just been finished at Dunecht (12 miles west of
Aberdeen) and was as yet unoccupied. The new chapel was solidly constructed of granite, and
the only entrance to the burial crypt was down a flight of eight steps leading from outside the
chapel. With the burial ceremony over, workmen sealed the entrance to the crypt with four
massive granite slabs and filled the crevices between the slabs with cement.
One Sunday morning in May 1881, the new Earl's housekeeper was walking near the chapel
when she smelled a strange aromatic perfume arising from the crypt. In the next few days,
others remarked on the odd smell so persistently that the new Earl ordered an inspection.
Workmen found a gap between the granite slabs which they attributed to a natural subsidence
of the soil and they further attributed the strange smell to decaying flowers within the vault.
They straightened the slabs, filled the cracks with cement, covered the whole entrance with
soil and planted it with shrubs.
In September 1881, Mr Yeats, the Earl's family solicitor, received a mysterious note at his
Aberdeen office. "Dear Sir," the letter ran, "the remains of the late Earl of Crawford are not
beneath the chapel at Dunecht, as you believe. The scent of flowers ascending from the crypt
will, on investigation, prove to be something else." The letter was signed "Nabob."
Yeats contacted the builder who had carried out the inspection of the vault. The builder
reassured Yeats, who as a result dismissed the letter as a grisly practical joke without
bothering to inform the Earl.
Early in December 1881, some tradesmen working at Dunecht House noticed that the soil
covering the entrance of the crypt had been tampered with and told the Earl. He summoned
Yeats, who, recalling the earlier note, called in the police. Inspection left no doubt that the
tomb had been violated. Picks and shovels, stolen from a nearby toolshed, littered the lawn.
Three sets of footprints, made by hobnailed boots and all different, showed in the mud. One
of the granite slabs had been moved and was propped up by a piece of wood, leaving a gap
of 18 inches. The raiders had chosen an ideal time, as the break-in had occurred the night
before, when a sudden storm had effectively covered any noise.
 
With grim foreboding, the police entered the crypt where they found the wooden coffins, the
lead coffin and the Italian-wood shell strewn about the floor, but there was no sign of the
body of the Earl. The mystery of the strange smell which saturated the air of the vault was,
however, solved; it came from the aromatic wood of the shell made in Italy.
The police poured every available man into Dunecht and combed the countryside for clues.
In the meantime Yeats believed that the mysterious "Nabob" held the answer. He inserted
notices in the agony columns of the British press asking Nabob to come forward, without
result. He then, on his own initiative, offered a £50 reward to the writer of the note if he came
forward. This time, Nabob's greed got the better of his discretion. He wrote to Yeats
assuring him that the Earl's body was still in the Dunecht area. He refused, however, to
disclose its hiding place until the 'desparadoes' who had carried it off were brought to justice.
He had no wish, he said, to be murdered by them or to be suspected by the police as an
accomplice.
A few days later, the Government offered a reward of £500 and a free pardon to anyone, not
being the guilty party, who gave information leading to the arrest of the grave-robber(s). From
all over Britain letters poured in, giving thousands of hiding places for the Earl's body. Some
writers claimed they had seen visions; others swore that they had helped carry the body under
threats. One letter made out such a good case against two Aberdeen men, Thomas Kirkwood
and John Philip, that the police arrested and charged them with the crime. Only watertight
alibis saved them. When all the letters had been sifted, the police concluded that Nabob was
the only person who had real knowledge of the crime, but he remained discreetly silent.
Public interest in the case was waning when, five months later, an Aberdeen man named George
Machray, a gamekeeper, came forward with some fresh information. As a result, the police
arrested a man named Charles Soutar, a rat-catcher who supplemented his income by poaching,
mainly on the Dunecht estate. No sooner had he been taken into custody than he confessed he
was "Nabob."
His story was that one night in April 1881 he was poaching deer near Dunecht when he heard a
rustling of bushes. Thinking the gamekeepers were looking for him, he fled but he tripped and
fell. Before he could rise, two men with blackened faces pinned him to the ground. As he lay
helpless, two more men who spoke 'like English gentlemen' loomed out of the dark. One of the
newcomers put a pistol to his head and seemed bent on killing him until one of his original
assailants told the armed man 'It's all right, it's only the rat-catcher on a poaching venture.'
When dawn broke, Soutar crept back into the woods, where he saw a carefully camouflaged
mound. He dug into it with his fingers and was horrified to find the embalmed body of a man,
wrapped in a blanket. The makeshift grave reeked of an aromatic perfume.
Based on Soutar's story, a party of police went to Dumbrock Wood where they found the body
exactly where Soutar had said it was. Although Soutar stuck doggedly to his story of the men
in the woods, the police found it too hard to believe and charged him with breaking into the
crypt.
Soutar was tried in October 1882 before Lord Craighill in the High Court in Edinburgh. He
pleaded ''not guilty.' At his trial, evidence began to pile up inexorably against Soutar. Witness
after witness testified that he had discussed the disappearance of the Earl's body long before
anyone but the body-snatcher could have known about it.
Soutar's counsel put the case for the defence simply. His story of the black-faced men was true.
Why, he asked, would a guilty man draw attention to the crime by writing the 'Nabob' letter and
persistently discussing the subject with half-a-dozen witnesses? Plainly, Soutar was an innocent
man - a man who feared for his life, but was determined to keep interest in the crime alive until
the real criminals were brought to justice.
The Solicitor General for Scotland, Alexander Asher, in his speech for the Crown, left the
defence's argument threadbare. The crime could only have been committed by someone who
knew Dunecht intimately and none knew it better than the self-confessed poacher, Soutar.
Why had Soutar persistently called attention to the crime? Simple, said Asher; there could be
only two reasons for the ghoulish theft - either to hold the Earl's family to ransom, or in the
hope that a reward would be offered. In either case, so long as the theft of the body went
undiscovered, the crime itself was useless. When the crypt had been re-sealed without
suspicion, Soutar was forced to write the Nabob note, which Yeats had ignored. In desperation,
said Asher, Soutar had then been forced to make a second raid on the tomb and prop up the
granite slab so that there could be no doubt that the vault had been violated.
After retiring for a mere 25 minutes, the jury found Soutar guilty and he was sentenced to five
years' penal servitude.
It seems to me that there are a number of unanswered questions in this case - is it likely that
Soutar, who does not seem to have been over-endowed with intelligence, hatched the whole
plot on his own? If he did, how did he single-handedly manage to pry up the massive granite
slabs? - he was reported to have been a small, weedy man. In any event, the fact that three
different sets of footprints had been found after the second raid was never explained.
Robert Crichton, 8th Lord Crichton of Sanquhar
The 8th Lord Crichton of Sanquhar was hanged for the murder of John Turner, a fencing-
master who had put out Crichton's eye in a fencing match five years earlier. The following
lengthy account is taken from a series entitled "Historic Tragedies of London Life" by
W.W. Hutchings, and which was serialized in the Adelaide 'Advertiser.' This particular
instalment appeared on 3 August 1901:-
'Among the noblemen who followed James VI [of Scotland] to England to share the good things
of which Queen Elizabeth's successor had the disposal, was Lord Sanquhar, the head of an
ancient and honorable family which had held the rank of baron for some 300 years. According
to Sir Edward Coke, who drew up a report of the strange events now to be related, the baron
was "a man of great courage and wit, endeared with many excellent gifts, as well natural as
acquired." This great lawyer was the Chief Justice of the Common Pleas at the time these things
fell out, and no doubt had excellent opportunities of forming a correct estimate of Sanquhar's
character; yet it is not easy to believe that a man of true courage could ever have been guilty
of the conduct to which he allowed himself to descend.
'In 1607, four years after James Stuart came south, Lord Sanquhar was visiting at Lord Norreys'
house in Oxfordshire, and there met a fencing-master from Whitefriars, John Turner by name,
who had been engaged to entertain the company with his feats of skill and to cross foils with
any who chose to enter the lists against him.
'Among those who challenged him was young Sanquhar, and, most unfortunately, in the course
of the fencing Turner struck his antagonist in the eye and thrust the ball out of its socket. The
eye must have been put back, for Sanquhar himself afterwards spoke of suffering less pain in it
after a while, and said that for at least two years he hoped for complete recovery.
'The injury, however, was a serious one. For many days the sufferer's life was in danger, and in
the end he completely lost the use of the damaged organ. According to Wilson, a contemporary
historian, Sanquhar brought the punishment upon himself by affronting the fencing-master and
mailiciously setting himself to degrade him in the eyes of his patrons, so provoking Turner that
he determined to make him smart for his arrogance and ill-will, without intending, however, to
punish him so severely as he actually did. This version of the affair is unsupported, and is, on
the face of it, improbable to the point of incredibility. Even if Sanquhar was guilty of
provocative behaviour, of which there is no proof, it is not to be believed that the hurt inflicted
upon him was aught but pure accident. If the young nobleman was really seeking to humiliate
Turner in the eyes of his pupils and patrons, it was only playing into his hands to inflict upon him
an injury for which the only excuse that could be urged was lack of skill in the fencing-master.
Sanquhar himself afterwards protested that on taking up his foil he explained he was doing so
only as a learner, and not as one that would contend with a master in his own profession, and
requested therefore that he should be treated "as a scholar," which meant that the face should
be exempted from attack; and I know of no reason for doubting this statement. To accept it,
however, is only to involve Lord Sanquhar in the greater condemnation for his subsequent
behaviour. Had he really treated the fencing-master with scorn and contumely, he might have
been excused for believing that the wound in the eye was inflicted wilfully and in resentment.
But after the explanation he gave at the taking up of the foils, the idea that the injury was
intentional ought never to have entered his mind. This eems to have been the view generally
taken of the affair; and Turner's expression of regret was accepted as sincere by everyone
except the sufferer himself.
'Unhappily Lord Sanquhar appears from the first to have suspected mailicious intent, and he
brooded over the thought until it ripened into a certainty, and the desire for revenge became a
fierce obsession. If Wilson, the contemporary writer already spoken of, could be believed, the
craving for vengeance was awakened in his soul by a casual remark of Henry the Fourth of
France. While the Scottish noble was at the French Court the King is said to have asked him
how he lost his eye. "It was done with a sword," was his vague reply, for he was willing to have
it thought that the wound was received in more dignified circumstances than in a bout at the
foils with a common fencing-master.
'Thereupon the King enquired, "Does the man live?" which question, says Wilson, in his uncouth
style, "gave an end to the discourse, but was the beginner of a strange confusion in his working
fancy." 'Tis a pretty story, but has, I fear, no basis in fact. Lord Sanquhar himself, though
afterwards he went minutely into his motives and feelings, breathed not a syllable about this
conversation, and, had it actually taken place, it is incredible that he should have missed such
an opportunity of representing his vengeance as having been instigated by a monarch, and a
monarch so renowned for chivalry as Henri Quatre.
'When, two years after the accident, Lord Sanquhar came back from France, he found that
Turner was at Greenwich Palace, "playing," to use the expression of those days, before King
James and his father-in-law, the King of Denmark; and so blind, according to his own account,
had hos rage against the man become, that he at once made up his mind to seek him out and
run him through, though well aware that to commit such an outrage at the Court would be
treated as a serious aggravation of his crime. He failed, however, to find his quarry, and,
learning that he had gone to London, he followed him thither, but again missed him; and the
first news he could get of him in town was that, by a strange coincidence, he had gone to
Lord Norreys' place, where the original mischief was done. For the time, therefore, Lord
Sanquhar laid aside his purpose, and took a journey to Scotland.
'The change of scene, however, did not rid him of his murderous purpose, and on finding himself
again in London, he once more set about tracking down his prey.
'He now resolved upon a change of tactics. Until this time, if he is to be believed, he had never
had any intention but to avenge his wrong with his own hand. But now, according to his own
story, he began to despair of a favorable opportunity, for while he himself was well-known at
Whitefriars, where Turner lived, the fencing-master was not familiar to him, and he had to take
with him those who knew Turner better than himself in order to "make siccar" of his man. He,
therefore, "agreed with" two of his countrymen, who, to use his rather fine phrase, "undertook
the acting of this tragedy" - in simple words he hired a brace of ruffians to commit an act of
murder.
'My readers, I think, will not be satisfied that this is the real explanation of his decision to
perpetrate the crime by deputy. It is most unlikely that he could have had any difficulty in
recognising the man, whom he had stood up to at the foils, and who had been almost
comstantly in his mind's eye for years; or if he had any such difficulty, what could have been
easier than to get a public character like Turner pointed out to him? Is it not a good deal more
likely that he feared that if he attacked Turner, unless he took him so completely by surprise
as to incur the contempt due to cowardice and treachery, he would be worsted, and might
even suffer more than the loss of any eye?
'However this may be, of the fact that he did "agree with" the men to assassinate Turner there
can be no doubt; but, to quote another of his euphemisms, "nothing ensued upon it." How it was
that the scheme missed fire we know not; but the probability is that the fellows decamped with
their earned money, not choosing to go any further with the sorry and perilous business.
'Sanquhar now had occasion to travel on the Continent, and was away for some time, but on
his return, he once more set himself to compass Turner's destruction, and finally prevailed upon
two of his servants, Robert Carlisle and Gilbert Gray, to do the deed. Gray, however, could not
bring himself to such a piece of wickedness. "Repenting," says Sir Edward Coke, "of a purpose
and act so barbarous, vile, and bloody, being touched with the motion of the Holy Ghost," he
resolved to back out of the affair, and, fearing his patron's wrath, he started for Harwich to take
ship for Denmark. Carlisle was a more determined villian. Telling his master of Gray's defection, he
volunterered to carry through the business himself, and he said he would do it as soon as Turner
was back in London, even though he perished in the attempt.
'It was early in May, 1612 that Gray "fell quite off."  On the 11th of that month - five long years
after the mischance at the foils - about 7 o'clock in the evening, Carlisle, and with him a page of
Lord Sanquhar's named Irving, came upon Turner at a tavern in Whitefriars near the febcing
school, sitting just outside the door with a friend. Either Carlisle or Irving, or both of them, must
have had some acquaintance with Turner, for they saluted him, and he civilly invited them to
drink with him. For answer Carlisle turned round, saw to the priming of a pistol which he had
concealed upon him, cocked it, and then suddenly, wheeling around, discharged it point blank at
the man who had just offered him hospitality.  The ball entered the heart, and with the